Srednicki 9.17, 9.18: Sum of Diagrams with Single Source Removed

  • Thread starter Thread starter kexue
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Srednicki
kexue
Messages
195
Reaction score
2
Why is the expression 9.17 the sum of all diagrams with a single source removed?

I thought diagrams stand for terms in double taylor expansion of Z_1(J).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The expression in 9.17 is

{\delta\over\delta J(x)}Z_1(J)\Bigr|_{J=0}

The derivative with respect to J removes one factor of J, and then all other factors of J are set to zero. So the only surviving diagrams are those that had just one J to begin with.
 
Thanks, Avodyne!

Actually, when I stared at it again this morning, I already figured it out by myself.

How come your such an expert on Srednick's book? Always when someone ask a question to his book, you give the answer right away. I remember you gave me great answers like one year back ago, which i have written as side notes in the book.
 
kexue said:
How come your such an expert on Srednick's book? Always when someone ask a question to his book, you give the answer right away. I remember you gave me great answers like one year back ago, which i have written as side notes in the book.
Srednicki had posted rough drafts of Spin Zero and Spin One Half at arxiv.org in 2004, and I thought they were much better than the existing textbooks, so by now I know the material pretty well.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top