Stability of Unstable Particles at High Energies: Third Generation

a dull boy
Messages
39
Reaction score
1
Are particles that are not stable (for example top, bottom quarks; W and Z) when
produced in particle colliders possibly stable at very high energies? Are third generation particles stable at high energies?
Thanks, Mark
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a dull boy said:
Are particles that are not stable (for example top, bottom quarks; W and Z) when
produced in particle colliders possibly stable at very high energies? Are third generation particles stable at high energies?
Thanks, Mark

No, unstable particles will eventually decay no matter what their energy. Due to relativistic time dilation, a higher energy particle will tend to have a longer lifetime as measured in the laboratory frame, but will nevertheless eventually decay. The measured lifetimes reported in the literature refer that in the rest frame of the particle.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top