Standard Candles: Explaining Flux & Hubble Constant

  • Thread starter Thread starter bowlbase
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Standard
bowlbase
Messages
145
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Suppose that we observe the redshifts and apparent fluxes of a sample of standard
candles. When observed at a distance of 1 Mpc, the standard candles are known to
have a flux F1Mpc = 1. From this sample of standard candles, we can measure the
Hubble constant H0.

redshift = z
flux = F
flux error = σ

The penalty function
\chi^2(H_o)=\sum_i^N(\frac{F_{model}(z_i|H_o-F_i)}{\sigma_i})^2

where ##F_{model}(z_i|H_o-F_i)## is the predicted flux of a standard candle at redshift z, given a value of Ho, and {zi, Fi, σi} are the redshift,
flux, and error for the ith standard candle. The best- fitting value of H0 consistent with the data is the value that minimizes ##\chi^2##.

a) Explain why F_{model}(z_i|H_o-F_i)=F_{1Mpc}(\frac{(1Mpc)H_o}{cz})^2


Homework Equations


Flux ##F=\frac{l}{4 \pi d^2}##
Hubble ##H=\frac{\dot{a}}{a}##

The Attempt at a Solution



I was given a data set of standard candle measurements with this problem but since I have no clue where the equation comes from I don't know if I'm suppose to use it for this or not. I'm guessing not since it wants me to explain why the equation is used.

I understand that ##z=\frac{v}{c}## so the equation is ##F_{model}(z_i|H_o-F_i)=F_{1Mpc}(\frac{(1Mpc)H_o}{v_{recession}})^2##

But, I don't know why this is necessarily the predicted flux.

Once I have this part understood I may have follow up questions because there is three parts to this. Let me know if I should go ahead and add those.

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm still struggling to understand this question. Anyone have some insight they might want to share?
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.

Similar threads

Back
Top