Standard Deviation of Averages

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the standard deviation of bird catch data grouped into 42 categories. The user seeks to determine if they can simply divide the standard deviation of the total catch by the number of people to find the average standard deviation per person. Responses indicate that this approach is incorrect; a list of individual weights caught by each person is necessary for accurate calculations. Averaging the group data does not yield valid results for individual-level analysis. Accurate standard deviation calculations require detailed data on individual catches rather than aggregated group data.
JohnFishy
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Any help would be much appreciated:

My data is grouped into 42 categories according to classification of bird catch. Each group contains "X" amount of species, but for ease of input we categorize them into subsets. For example:

Group 1: 265.5 kg
Group 2: 47 kg
Group 3: 213.5 kg
etc...
Group 42: 63 kg

The sum is equal to 4765 kg. However, to get the average, the total is divided by 400 which is the total amount of birds per people catching them. Hence, the average catch per person is roughly 12 birds. Now if I take the std. deviation of the groups' averages (4765 kg) I get 92.6. Dividing that by 400 I get 0.23 kg.

My question is this; can I simply take the standard deviation of the 'population' whole (each group's average) and divide it by 400? Or is it much more complex due to squaring. Do I need to collate the entire data set into weight of individual birds (not groups)? If I take the std. deviation of every individual birds weight, the result is 3.19 kg. However, this is for every bird not birds/person.

Regards,
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello John, welcome to PF :smile: !

Not clear to me what the data you show represent. Nor what you want to obtain by taking an average.
What I read: An unspecified number of persons go bird catching. Each person catches on average 400 birds ?
In total 4765 kg of bird is caught (yuch !)

The birds are categorized in groups by species.

Then what does averaging do for you ? Let alone determining the standard deviation ?

I don't believe the numbers either: if the sum is 4765 kg and there are 42 groups then the average is 113 kg per group and the standard deviation will be much less than 93 kg.
 
Im sorry for not clarifing more. There are 400 people, what I wish to obtain is an average catch per person with a standard deviation. So, can I take the standard deviation of the whole (4765 kg) and divide that by 400 to get the average std. deviation of bird weight catch per person?
 
JohnFishy said:
Im sorry for not clarifing more. There are 400 people, what I wish to obtain is an average catch per person with a standard deviation. So, can I take the standard deviation of the whole (4765 kg) and divide that by 400 to get the average std. deviation of bird weight catch per person?
No. If you want that, you will need to have a list of the weight caught by each individual person. That is not a list of the weight caught in the 42 groups.
 
BvU said:
No. If you want that, you will need to have a list of the weight caught by each individual person. That is not a list of the weight caught in the 42 groups.
 
JohnFishy said:
BvU said:
No. If you want that, you will need to have a list of the weight caught by each individual person. That is not a list of the weight caught in the 42 groups.
Not a helpful reply if all you do is quote a previous post.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top