Standard perturbation theory - what exactly is meant?

omg!
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
"standard perturbation theory" - what exactly is meant?

hi,

could someone please help me out with the question in the title, in the following context:

standard perturbation theory can be viewed as a special case of the
semiclassical method, where one quantises fluctuations around trivial
classical solutions, whereas in soliton or instanton physics, one does the
same thing around non-trivial, non-perturbative classical solutions.

the quantization around trivial classical solutions can be done via the minkowskian path integral, while instanton solutions arise in the euclidean formalism (using a semiclassical approximation, in the sense of stationary phase approximation and steepest descent).

however, I'm not sure what the author (Rajamaran) means with standard perturbation theory and the assertion that instanton solutions are non-perturbative classical solutions.

Thanks a lot.

(i hope my question makes sense, I'm quite new at qm)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Instantons are lowest action solutions of the Classical Field Theory that live in a different topological sector from the typical lowest action solution, the Classical "vacuum" of ##A_{\mu} = 0##. Different Topological sector means that the Fiber Bundle of which they are a section is not homeomorphic to the Fiber Bundle of the vacuum solution (despite them both having the same base space). It is not really possible to discuss Instantons without the language of Fiber Bundles, so I cannot simplify it beyond that without explaining the theory of Fiber Bundles.

They are "nonperturbative" because typically these Classical solutions contain information about the corresponding Quantum Field Theory that is not accessible from Perturbation theory about the Classical vacuum.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top