!Evidence of Star Formation in Molecular Clouds

AI Thread Summary
Molecular clouds are recognized as the primary sites of star formation due to their dense, cold environments that facilitate the accumulation of gas and dust. Observations of young star clusters, such as the Pleiades, provide evidence of recent star formation, with ages estimated between 75 and 150 million years based on stellar evolution models. The presence of nebulae, often referred to as stellar nurseries, indicates ongoing star formation processes, as they contain both young stars and the materials necessary for new star creation. The Spitzer Telescope has identified thousands of planetary disks, further supporting the notion of active star formation in these regions. Overall, the combination of observational data from star clusters, nebulae, and planetary disks illustrates that star formation is a continuous and dynamic process in the universe.
blumfeld0
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
What evidence do we have that stars are forming right now?

Molecular clouds? why do we know that molecular clouds are where stars form? any other lines of evidence? i know this is a big topic so a few reasons or a good link would be a good start for me to understand this big topic

thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Though it is difficult to watch real-time, we can see stars in all stages of their lifespan, including formation itself. The Pleiades, for example, is a star cluster that formed relatively recently, the stars are young...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pleiades_(star_cluster )
It is dominated by young, hot blue stars...

Ages for star clusters can be estimated by comparing the H-R diagram for the cluster with theoretical models of stellar evolution, and using this technique, ages for the Pleiades of between 75 and 150 million years have been estimated.
Heh - and learn something new every day. I thought the nebulosity of the cluster was left-over from its formation, but apparently not:
It was formerly thought that the dust was left over from the formation of the cluster, but at the age of about 100 million years generally accepted for the cluster, almost all the dust originally present would have been dispersed by radiation pressure. Instead, it seems that the cluster is simply passing through a particularly dusty region of the interstellar medium.
Here is a picture of "stellar nursery": http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap960816.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Like Russ said, you can examine many different nebulae and see the different stages of star formation (the whole process is too long to watch). There's still a lot of virgin material out there ready to make new stars.
 
The Spitzer Telescope alone has found thousands (yes thousands) of planetary disks (stellar accretion areas).

The following is a recent survey of 2300 in the Orion nebula...

http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.cfm?release=2006-099
 
thanks Geo. Cam on ban nhe.
 
Yeh as the guys above have said you can look at nebulae which are, as I am sure you know, generally thought of as stellar nurseries due to it being a dark, cold environment which is good for star forming (stellar winds push protostar material away).

Evidence for recently 'turned on' stars (hydrogen fusion begun) is say a star in a nebula which is glowing brightly but tightly surrounded by dust and gas save for a small pocket just outside the star, showing it is in the process of pushing this material away

dunno if that helps
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top