Stars twinkle, but planets don't?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fatty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planets Stars
AI Thread Summary
Stars twinkle due to atmospheric variations in temperature and pressure that affect light refraction, causing a shifting image. In contrast, planets do not twinkle as much because they are not point sources; they have a measurable size that results in a steadier appearance. While some stars can shine brighter than planets, the twinkling effect is primarily related to the point-like nature of stars. The phenomenon can occasionally be observed in planets, particularly when they are near the horizon. Understanding these differences clarifies why stars and planets appear differently in the night sky.
fatty
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone - newbie here. Am I right to say that stars twinkle because of regions of the atmosphere being at different (and varying) temperatures and pressures etc., giving rise to a variation in refractive index and consequently a shifting image of the observed object? If so, why don't I observe planets to do the same thing? I thought it might be because planets appear much brighter, but then don't some stars shine more brightly than some planets at times? Thanks.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Stars twinkle because of the movement and different temperatures in the atmosphere cause the light to refract. You have that part right, the reason that planets do not seem to twinkle (I have seen Saturn twinkle when close too the horizon) is not due to the brightness but it is due to the size of the image. Stars are point sources and planets have some size too them.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
77
Views
9K
Replies
14
Views
10K
Replies
21
Views
28K
Back
Top