Static equilibrium problem -- with a pulley

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a static equilibrium problem involving a pulley, emphasizing the importance of correctly identifying moment arms and force components. Participants point out that a moment arm was initially omitted in the calculations, leading to confusion in the torque contributions. After several edits, the user arrives at a new force magnitude but continues to face issues with the calculations, particularly with the Ax component. There is also mention of adjusting to a new calculator, which may be affecting the accuracy of the results. Overall, the thread highlights the challenges of ensuring all elements are accounted for in static equilibrium problems.
J-dizzal
Messages
394
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


20150718_174005_zpspkrqlnql.jpg


Homework Equations


sum of forces equal to zero.

The Attempt at a Solution


20150718_200836_zpsvjmoossd.jpg
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like you left out a moment arm in one of your terms in ΣMA.
 
I can't really follow your work computing components of forces and making sure each force contributes to torque.
 
Thank you, i didnt notice the 6in on the pulley at first.
TSny said:
Looks like you left out a moment arm in one of your terms in ΣMA.

Dr. Courtney said:
I can't really follow your work computing components of forces and making sure each force contributes to torque.
I updated my original post but I am still getting the same answer haha.
 
Note that FDBsinθ is a force component, not a moment. What's the moment arm for this force?
 
TSny said:
Note that FDBsinθ is a force component, not a moment. What's the moment arm for this force?
oh crap sorry, let me finish that equation.
Ok, for the sum of moments i got 830.5 lb, now let me correct the rest of the equations and see what i get for an answer to the magnitude of A.
edit. 880.7 lb
edit2. 1761.5
 
Last edited:
In the ΣMA equation, your last term is -FDB. Is this meant to be there?
 
TSny said:
In the ΣMA equation, your last term is -FDB. Is this meant to be there?
no its not supposed to be there, I've change it again, I've edited my original post. there is still something wrong with it though...
 
Check your calculation of Ax. Looks like you have it set up correctly, but made some sort of mistake in plugging the numbers in your calculator.
 
  • Like
Likes J-dizzal
  • #10
TSny said:
Check your calculation of Ax. Looks like you have it set up correctly, but made some sort of mistake in plugging the numbers in your calculator.
thanks.
I got a new HP 300s calculator in the mail today, still getting used to it...
 

Similar threads

Replies
43
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K