Static pressure tubes vs pitot tubes

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chris J
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
L-shaped tubes with side holes are preferred for measuring static pressure in ducts because they minimize the influence of boundary layer effects and duct surface roughness. This design allows for more accurate readings by positioning the measurement point away from the duct wall, which can distort results if a simple side connection is used. While a direct connection could yield reasonable measurements, it may not be as reliable without additional probes. The L-shaped configuration also facilitates access to deeper areas within the duct for comprehensive pressure assessments. Accurate static pressure measurement is crucial for effective HVAC system performance.
Chris J
Messages
21
Reaction score
3
I've noticed when measuring static pressure in a duct most people use L shaped tubes with small holes in the sides, very similar to a pitot tube except it's missing the hole in the end for dynamic pressure.

What is the reason for using an L tube with holes in the sides for static pressure alone? Wouldn't just a connection into the side of the duct generally provide a fairly accurate measurement?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Chris J said:
What is the reason for using an L tube with holes in the sides for static pressure alone? Wouldn't just a connection into the side of the duct generally provide a fairly accurate measurement?
It should, but it would require a second hole and probe. I've also seen L shaped static pressure probes though, and I think they want to be a little away from the side of the duct so there's no weird effects from the boundary layer or roughness.

https://www.contractingbusiness.com/service/article/21212881/secrets-of-the-static-pressure-tip
 
  • Like
Likes jack action and Chris J
My idea is that I want to use immerse Whitetail Antlers in a fishtank to measure their volumetric displacement (the Boone and Crockett system is the current record measurement standard to place in a juxtaposition with) I would use some sight glass plumbed into the side of the tank to get the change in height so that I can multiply by the tank cross-section. Simple Idea. But... Is there a simple mechanical way to amplify the height in the sight glass to increase measurement precision...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
14K
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K