I Static rotational friction: does diameter matter?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the diameter of a washer affects static friction in a bolted joint. One viewpoint suggests that friction is independent of surface area, implying diameter does not matter, while another argues that a larger diameter increases the moment due to friction acting further from the axis of rotation. The resolution lies in distinguishing between linear slip force and torque for tightening; the former is unaffected by diameter, while the latter is influenced by it. To analyze this, one must determine if the bolt head or washer is slipping and calculate torque based on the average diameter of the slipping surfaces. This topic is typically covered in machine design literature, particularly in sections on bolted joints.
ShearStress
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Imagine a bolted joint with a washer between the bolt and the surface.

Assuming the washer is always covered by the bolt head so it's getting a consistent load, does the washer's diameter impact the static friction being imparted on the surface?

I see two conflicting ways of viewing this:
1.) Friction doesn't care about surface area, so no the washer diameter doesn't matter (perhaps this is more relevant for linear friction, not rotational?)
2.) The larger the washer is, the higher the moment is since the friction is acting further from the axis of rotation

What's the answer and how can this solution be expressed mathematically?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see a conflict, the friction force stays the same but the moment is proportional to the diameter (assuming the normal force is equally distributed along the washer's diameter, which is not certain).
 
Your question is unclear:

1) If you are asking about the force to make the joint slip linearly, then your statement #1 is correct.

2) If you are asking about the torque to tighten the bolt, then your statement #2 is correct. The procedure is:
A) Determine if the bolt head is slipping on the washer or the washer is slipping on the joint.
B) Calculate the torque using the average diameter of the slipping surfaces, assuming the compressive stress is evenly distributed.

A quick search for bolt torque calculations did not find this, but it is in any book on machine design. It's in the chapter on bolted joints.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top