Statics Help (Equilibrium of Forces of Resultant?)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the tension in segments of a chain used in a device for straightening wrecked auto frames, given a force of 3.5 kN exerted by a hydraulic cylinder. The problem is analyzed as an equilibrium scenario, leading to tensions of 3.78 kN for segment AB and 2.99 kN for segment BC, which were confirmed as correct. Confusion arises regarding the classification of the problem as equilibrium since it seems counterintuitive that a force of 3.5 kN can result in a higher tension. A key point highlighted is that an object can be in equilibrium and still move at a constant velocity, as long as the net forces sum to zero. This clarification emphasizes the distinction between equilibrium and resultant force scenarios in physics.
steffyj
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The device shown is used to straighten the frames of wrecked autos. Determine the tension of each segment of the chain, i.e. AB and BC, if the force which the hydraulic cylinder DB exerts on point B is 3.5kN

php4nLUw9.png


Homework Equations



I am trying to figure out if the problem is an equilibrium, or a resultant problem. If it is equilibrium, the equations are:

ƩFx = 0
ƩFy = 0

If it is a resultant:

FDB = TBC - TAB

The Attempt at a Solution



This was a problem we had in class. I first worked the problem as an equilibrium and got the tensions to be:

Tab = 3.78 kN and Tbc = 2.99 kN, both of which are the right answers.

I then second guessed myself, mainly because I did not understand how a force of 3.5kN could create a tension of 3.78kN, and reworked the problem as a resultant problem. I ended up getting the problem wrong, and although I'm 99.9% that I was truly wrong, I am still confused as to why this problem is treated as an equilibrium problem. It appears to me, that for the device to work, the point B would not be in equilibrium.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am still confused as to why this problem is treated as an equilibrium problem

Are any parts accelerating?

If the forces on an object (eg point B) sum to zero that doesn't imply it's stationary. It can be moving at constant velocity but not accelerating. Remember Newton says F=ma.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top