Engineering Statics problem: A ramp is supported by two cables

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating moments in a statics problem involving a ramp supported by two cables. Participants clarify the correct application of the moment formula, emphasizing the need to use the distance from point C to point A (##r_{CA}##) rather than from point G (##r_{GA}##). The confusion arises from the interpretation of the moment being calculated at point A versus point C. Ultimately, it is established that both distances yield equivalent results due to their relationship, but the correct approach is crucial for clarity in problem-solving.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium principles
  • Familiarity with moment calculations in physics
  • Knowledge of vector cross products
  • Ability to interpret force diagrams
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the moment formula in static systems
  • Learn about vector cross products and their significance in mechanics
  • Explore examples of static equilibrium problems involving multiple forces
  • Investigate common mistakes in moment calculations and how to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in engineering, particularly those studying statics or mechanics, as well as educators looking for clarification on moment calculations in physics problems.

Camailee
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
The ramp ABCD is supported by cables at corners C and D. The tensile force in both cables is 420N. Determine the moment about point A produced by the force exerted at point C.
Relevant Equations
Moment at A (MA) = rGA x TCG.
Where rGA = GA/|GA|
TCG = 420N
Problem illustration:
IMG_20210107_212412.jpg


The possible answers are:
IMG_20210107_210036.jpg

I don't understand why it says Mc if it is asking for the moment at A, not C. But maybe I am getting something wrong.

So with the formulas I posted above, I have this:
IMG_20210107_212105.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your mistake is that you insert ##r_{GA}## in the formula for the moment while you should insert ##r_{CA}##. It is the moment about point A, of the force that is applied at point C not at point G.

What you did is calculate the moment about A, of the force that is applied at point G which is not what is asked for. The forces at G and C might be equal in magnitude , but the point of application differs (and the direction reverses).
 
Delta2 said:
Your mistake is that you insert ##r_{GA}## in the formula for the moment while you should insert ##r_{CA}##. It is the moment about point A, of the force that is applied at point C not at point G.

What you did is calculate the moment about A, of the force that is applied at point G which is not what is asked for. The forces at G and C might be equal in magnitude , but the point of application differs (and the direction reverses).

Thank you for your answer Delta2. Was really helpful!

I understand what you mean. In fact the approach you mentioned is the one I thought first. I did it and the answer I got wasn't included on all the possible answers.

IMG_20210108_122416.jpg


The other approach I posted above, with the ##r_{GA}## was based on an example I found, asking the same thing of the same structure, but with different distance units. Why does ##r_{GA}## is used, instead of ##r_{CA}## ?

IMG_20210108_122913.jpg


Update: As I suspected and mentioned before, the possible answers are wrong because they are referring to the moment ##M_C## and not ##M_A## .
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2021-01-08-10-38-03-711_com.google.android.apps.docs.jpg
    Screenshot_2021-01-08-10-38-03-711_com.google.android.apps.docs.jpg
    30.1 KB · Views: 296
  • Screenshot_2021-01-08-10-38-03-711_com.google.android.apps.docs.jpg
    Screenshot_2021-01-08-10-38-03-711_com.google.android.apps.docs.jpg
    30.1 KB · Views: 288
Last edited:
Well sorry , I now see that it is the same thing whether you take the arm to be ##r_{CA}## or ##r_{GA}## because it is ##r_{CA}=r_{GA}+r_{CG}## and when we take the cross product with ##T_{CG}## the term ##r_{CG}\times T_{CG}=0## vanishes. You indeed calculated both to be equal which verifies it.

I don't know why the answer doesn't match one of the options. It might be because they are referring to the moment ##M_C## as you say, i.e moment about point C.
 
  • Like
Likes Camailee

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K