Statics problem, trailer and truck system

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around solving a statics problem involving a trailer and truck system, specifically focusing on the forces acting on the trailer (A) and truck (B and C). The correct force for the trailer (A) was calculated as 982 lb, leading to a derived force (D) of 436 lb acting upwards. However, the initial calculations for the truck's forces (B and C) were incorrect due to a misunderstanding of the direction of force D, which acts downwards from the truck's perspective. The participants clarified that the truck's weight (2900 lbs) does not need to be included in the calculations for the additional load caused by the trailer.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium equations (ƩFx=0, ƩFy=0, ƩM=0)
  • Knowledge of force analysis in mechanical systems
  • Familiarity with the concepts of load distribution and moments
  • Basic understanding of vector forces and their directions
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of static equilibrium in mechanical systems
  • Study the effects of load distribution on vehicle dynamics
  • Learn about moment calculations in statics problems
  • Explore case studies involving trailer and truck systems in engineering contexts
USEFUL FOR

Engineering students, mechanical engineers, and anyone involved in vehicle dynamics or statics analysis will benefit from this discussion.

yaro99
Messages
75
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


OFFNgB8.png



Homework Equations


ƩFx=0
ƩFy=0
ƩM=0

The Attempt at a Solution



I will call the tire forces A (for the trailer), and B and C (for the truck)

I got the correct answer for A by isolating the trailer and writing this equation for it:
ƩMD = 2400*9 - 2*A*11 = 0
A = 982lb ↑

to find D, I wrote this equation, still just for the trailer:
ƩFy = 2*A - 2400 + D = 0
2*982 - 2400 + D = 0
D = 436lb ↑

I got the wrong answers for B and C.
To find them, I tried isolating the truck and using these equations:
ƩMC = 2900*4 - 2*B*9 - D*12 = 0
2900*4 - 436*12 - 18*B = 0
B = 354 lb ↑

ƩFy = D + 2*B - 2900 +2*C = 0
436 + 2*354 - 2900 + 2*C = 0
C = 878lb ↑


Also, I inadvertently found the answer to part (b) when I started the problem by calculating the equilibrium equations for the truck that I wrote above, but forgetting to factor the truck's weight into the equations. I'm not sure why this would yield the correct answer; I would appreciate it if someone could try to explain that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yaro99 said:
D = 436lb ↑

I got the wrong answers for B and C.
To find them, I tried isolating the truck and using these equations:
ƩMC = 2900*4 - 2*B*9 - D*12 = 0
You found that from the trailer's perspective D acts upwards. Which way does it act from the truck's perspective?
 
haruspex said:
You found that from the trailer's perspective D acts upwards. Which way does it act from the truck's perspective?

Ah, thank you!
It is pointing down from the truck's perspective, so the signs should be switched on the 2 equations. This gives me the right answer.

I am still curious about part b) though. Why is the truck's weight omitted in the calculation?
 
Looks to me like the weight of the truck (2900 lbs) is included in the calculations.
 
yaro99 said:
I am still curious about part b) though. Why is the truck's weight omitted in the calculation?
Since it is asking for the extra load that results from the trailer, I don't understand why you think the truck's weight should be relevant (as long as it weighs enough to stop the trailer flipping backwards).
SteamKing said:
Looks to me like the weight of the truck (2900 lbs) is included in the calculations.
I think yaro99 is referring to an earlier (unposted) attempt at part a.
 
SteamKing said:
Looks to me like the weight of the truck (2900 lbs) is included in the calculations.

Using these equations yields the correct answer for part b), when I plug in 436 for D:
ƩMC = -2*B*9 + D*12 = 0
ƩFy = -D + 2*B +2*C = 0

ΔB = +291lb
ΔC = -72.7lb
Weight is not included in the above equations. I'm just not sure why this is the right answer.
 
Well, the trailer is pushing down on the hitch. It stands to reason that the truck would see an increase in the load put on the rear wheels while the front wheels would see a reduction in the load. Imagine the truck rotating counterclockwise due to the hitch load.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K