Stationary States: Differential Equations Issues

Elwin.Martin
Messages
202
Reaction score
0
So in Griffith's (ed. 2 page 37) there's an equation that says that
**pretend the h's are h-bars...I don't know Latex very well**

ih\frac{1}{\varphi}\frac{d\varphi}{dt}=-\frac{h^{2}}{2m}\frac{1}{\psi}\frac{d^{2}\psi}{dx^{2}}+V

Since in this simplified case V where is a function of x alone he says that each side is equal to a constant but I'm still trying to figure out why.

I can see that the LHS is a function of t alone because he made the wave function separable and the \varphi is a function of t and the \psi is a function of x but I'm not sure why it's important. I see that if we set the equation equal to a constant the rest of the math works out nicely but I can't see what allows us to do this.

If we had say \frac{dy}{dx}=\frac{dz}{dt} and we set the whole thing equal to c, how would I know that y(x) = cx and z(t) = ct (they're the same constant right?) so y(x)/x=z(t)/t ?


Any direction would be great and thank you for your time,
elwin.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Elwin.Martin said:
**pretend the h's are h-bars...I don't know Latex very well**

h-bar in Latex is \hbar (surprise! ).

The equation has to be true for any value of x and any value of t.

First pick a value of t and use it to evaluate the LHS. This gives you a number. No matter what value you use for x, the RHS must evaluate to that number. So the RHS is constant.

Now start over. Pick a value of x and use it to evaluate the RHS... (see if you can fill in the rest.)
 
Can you see another possibility? Remember that mathematically, a variable is free to take any value in its domain. So if the LHS is only a function of t, and the RHS is only a function of x, can you find any function f(x,t) that is NOT a constant, yet still satisfies both sides of the equation independently?

In other words, what you are given is:

g(x)=h(t)

and I am asking you to do is find any f(x,t) that is NOT a constant and satisfies BOTH

g(x)=f(x,t)

AND

h(t)=f(x,t)

for ALL allowable values of x and t.
 
jtbell said:
h-bar in Latex is \hbar (surprise! ).

The equation has to be true for any value of x and any value of t.

First pick a value of t and use it to evaluate the LHS. This gives you a number. No matter what value you use for x, the RHS must evaluate to that number. So the RHS is constant.

Now start over. Pick a value of x and use it to evaluate the RHS... (see if you can fill in the rest.)

haha thank you for that

I think I see what you mean now.
 
SpectraCat said:
Can you see another possibility? Remember that mathematically, a variable is free to take any value in its domain. So if the LHS is only a function of t, and the RHS is only a function of x, can you find any function f(x,t) that is NOT a constant, yet still satisfies both sides of the equation independently?

In other words, what you are given is:

g(x)=h(t)

and I am asking you to do is find any f(x,t) that is NOT a constant and satisfies BOTH

g(x)=f(x,t)

AND

h(t)=f(x,t)

for ALL allowable values of x and t.

That makes a whole lot more sense!

thank you very much for your time,
elwin.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top