Statistical Mechanics: Can one assume an idealized gas is non-relativistic

AI Thread Summary
When discussing an idealized gas, it is generally acceptable to assume a non-relativistic regime unless specified otherwise. This assumption allows for the application of classical mechanics, where the relationship E=p^2/2m holds true. The non-relativistic approximation simplifies calculations and is valid under typical conditions for gases at standard temperatures and pressures. However, in extreme conditions, such as high velocities or low temperatures, relativistic effects may need to be considered. Overall, the non-relativistic assumption is a common and practical approach in statistical mechanics.
binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12
In general when one talks about an idealized gas, should/could one assume it is non-relativistic? (s.t E=p^2/2m will hold)

many thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
binbagsss said:
In general when one talks about an idealized gas, should/could one assume it is non-relativistic? (s.t E=p^2/2m will hold)
Unless explicitly told otherwise, I would always assume a non-relativistic regime.
 
  • Like
Likes binbagsss
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top