Sound in a gas of non-interacting particles?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of sound in a gas composed of non-interacting particles, particularly in the context of statistical mechanics and thermodynamics. Participants explore whether statistical approaches, such as the canonical ensemble, adequately describe sound propagation in such a medium, and the implications of particle interactions and collisions on thermal equilibrium and sound transmission.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question how sound waves can exist in a medium of non-interacting particles, suggesting that statistical approaches may not apply without thermal equilibrium.
  • Others argue that particles in an ideal gas do interact during collisions, which are essential for achieving thermal equilibrium.
  • It is noted that non-interacting particles can still collide, behaving as rigid spheres that exchange momentum only upon collision.
  • A participant references the Hamiltonian used in the canonical ensemble, emphasizing that it is purely kinetic and does not account for interactions beyond collisions.
  • Another participant cites the Boltzmann equation, explaining that particles are assumed to move freely most of the time, with collisions occurring infrequently, which influences the description of the gas as a fluid.
  • One participant asserts that a kinetic approach is necessary for sound transmission, implying that the canonical ensemble model may not suffice.
  • In contrast, another participant claims that sound transmission is possible by considering small perturbations in density, invoking linear-response theory.
  • A later reply raises a question about the implications of reducing the collision cross-section to zero, suggesting that sound transmission may become impossible as damping diverges.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of statistical mechanics to sound propagation in non-interacting particle systems, with some asserting the necessity of a kinetic approach while others maintain that sound can still propagate under certain conditions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of particle interactions and the conditions under which sound can be transmitted.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding assumptions about particle interactions, the definition of non-interacting particles, and the conditions necessary for thermal equilibrium. The discussion also highlights the dependence on specific models and theoretical frameworks, which may not universally apply.

greypilgrim
Messages
583
Reaction score
44
Hi.

In some statistical approaches (e.g. canonical ensemble), the particles of an ideal gas are non-interacting. Still, it's possible to derive the ideal gas law and other thermodynamic relations.

Wikipedia gives an equation for the speed of sound in an ideal gas. How can there be waves in a medium of non-interacting components?

Or do statistical approaches not apply here because we have no thermal equilibrium and we need a kinetic approach?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The particles in an ideal gas interact when they collide and exchange momentum and energy.
Without collisions there will be no thermal equilibrium.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Generally, when assuming the particles are non-interacting, this doesn't discount collisions. It just means they are being treated as essentially rigid spherical particles that collide but don't repel or attract each other.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Delta2
greypilgrim said:
the particles of an ideal gas are non-interacting
Non-interacting means that behave independent from one another, and exchange momentum only upon collision.

At the top of the wiki,
Generally, a gas behaves more like an ideal gas at higher temperature and lower pressure,[1] as the potential energy due to intermolecular forces becomes less significant compared with the particles' kinetic energy, and the size of the molecules becomes less significant compared to the empty space between them
.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
nasu said:
The particles in an ideal gas interact when they collide and exchange momentum and energy.
Without collisions there will be no thermal equilibrium.
boneh3ad said:
Generally, when assuming the particles are non-interacting, this doesn't discount collisions. It just means they are being treated as essentially rigid spherical particles that collide but don't repel or attract each other.
256bits said:
Non-interacting means that behave independent from one another, and exchange momentum only upon collision.

But the Hamiltonian used to derive all thermodynamics in the canonical ensemble is purely kinetic:
$$H\left(\left\{\mathbf{q}_i\right\},\left\{\mathbf{p}_i\right\}\right)=\sum_i \frac{\mathbf{p}^2_i}{2m}$$
It's separable, there is no interaction at all.
 
Check vol. X of Landau and Lifshitz, where the Boltzmann equation is derived. Then you'll see, how this comes about: The particles are assumed to move almost always freely and that only from time to time collisions occur, i.e., the mean free path of the particles is assumed to be much smaller than the interaction range. The relaxation time, i.e., the time scale upon which small perturbations of the gas from equilibrium relaxes to equilibrium is parametrically given by
$$\tau_{\text{eq}} \sim \frac{1}{n v_{\text{rel}} \sigma},$$
where ##n## is the particle-number density, ##v_{\text{rel}}## the average relative velocity between the particles, and ##\sigma## the (elastic) scattering cross section for ##2 \rightarrow 2## collisions.

The gas is the better described by hydrodynamics (i.e., local thermal equibrium) the smaller ##\tau_{\text{eq}}## is. So a gas is the better a perfect fluid the larger the cross section is!
 
So my assumptions from the start is correct that one needs to take a kinetic approach and the ideal gas as modeled in the canonical ensemble is not capable of transmitting sound?
 
Sure it is. You have to consider a small perturbation (in density in this case) to get the speed of sound (linear-response theory).
 
Does it mean that, on the limit as the collision cross-section shrinks to zero, sound becomes impossible as the damping of sound diverges?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K