Statistical mechanics- Stirling's Approximation and Particle Configurations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the number of configurations for N distinguishable particles in a box, focusing on those on the surface and in the gas phase. For n particles on the surface, the configurations are given by the binomial coefficient \(\binom{M}{n}\), while the remaining N-n particles in the gas phase have \(\binom{aV}{N-n}\) configurations. The entropy S of the system is derived using the total number of configurations \(\Omega = \binom{M}{n}\binom{aV}{N-n}\) and applying Stirling's approximation. Participants express difficulty with the algebra involved in these calculations, particularly in ensuring the correct application of configurations for both surface and gas phase particles. Clarifications were made regarding the number of available states for particles on the surface versus those in the gas phase.
aurora14421
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



N weakly interacting distinguishable particles are in a box of volume V. A particle can lie on one of the M possible locations on the surface of the box and the number of states available to each particle not on the surface (in the gas phase) is aV, for some constant a.

1. What is the number of configurations for n particles on the surface?

2. What is the number of configurations for the remaining N-n particles in the gas phase (i.e. not on the surface)?

3. Show the entropy, S, of the configuration of n particles on the surface and N-n particles in the gas phase is given by:

S = k[M ln(M) - n ln(n)-(M-n) ln(M-n) + (N-n) ln(aV)]

k is Boltzmann's constant.

Homework Equations



S=k ln (\Omega)

ln (N!) = N ln(N) - N (Stirling's approximation)

The Attempt at a Solution



1. You have n atoms and M possible locations, so number of configurations is:

\binom{M}{n}

2. You have aV possible locations and N-n atoms so number of configurations is:

\binom{aV}{N-n}

3. \Omega = \binom{M}{n}\binom{aV}{N-n} and use Stirling's approximation in the expression for entropy.

I can't get the algebra to work in this question, which makes me think that I've got part 1 or 2 (or both) wrong.

Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In part 1 it seems you are neglecting that each location has aV configurations...
 
Sorry, I mistyped the question. It's fixed now. So there are only M possible sites on the surface and aV states when it's not on the surface.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top