Statistical Physics number of particles with spin 1/2 in a B-field

notnewton96
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



therm52.jpg


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



To be honest I'm clueless. I've missed a large amount of the course and just struggling to find any sources that explain this. I don't want the answer to the question, I want to figure that out for myself. What I really need is someone to point me in the right direction by either explaining the question in part or providing a good source of information such as a website or book.

I don't even know how to visualize the question. Would it be as a sheet of N particles orientated along the magnetic field direction? The particles can be orientated either positive to the direction of the magnetic field or opposed to it. When it is said that there are n up does this mean that the number of rows could be thought of as n? Or am I completely wrong?

Any and all information would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Would it be as a sheet of N particles orientated along the magnetic field direction?
Something like that. You have N independent particles, each of them can be oriented along the magnetic field ("up", ms=+1/2) or in the opposite direction ("down", ms=-1/2). Spins are additive, so if you have n "up" and N-n "down", ...

(b) is combinatorics (which particles are "up" and which are "down"?). Once you have that, you can use it to calculate (c) and (d).
 
Thank you so much for the reply. That's made it much clearer.

So part a is simply:

m_s = n(1/2) + (N-n)(-1/2)
m_s = n/2 - (1/2)(N-n)
m_s = (1/2)(2n-N)

I'm having a bit of trouble getting part b as a function of n. Because isn't the number of states simply (number of up + number of down)^N?

This gives N^N as the answer. I'm obviously missing something.
 
Let's consider a simple example: N=3, n=1. You have the options (up, down, down), (down, up, down) and (down, down, up), for a total of 3 options.
 
I'm sorry but the concept still isn't clear to me. Whichever way I try to define the number of possible states I have to use the term N. What am I missing?

Thanks again for the help :)
 
Yes, N will show up in the result. Where is the problem?
 
##|\Psi|^2=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\exp(\frac{-(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##\braket{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx\,x\exp(-\frac{(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##y=x-x_0 \quad x=y+x_0 \quad dy=dx.## The boundaries remain infinite, I believe. ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dy(y+x_0)\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2}).## ##\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,y\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2})+\frac{2x_0}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,\exp(-\frac{y^2}{b^2}).## I then resolved the two...
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top