Statistical uncertainty of weighted mean

Brais
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello!

I am using physical data to do an analysis (~30k measurements). These measurements include energies, momenta, angles... of particles.
I am calculating a value (call it v) at the end after a lengthy process, and if I introduce all the data into my program I did, the result is v±σ.
If, however, I "bin" my events in energy and angle (say I made four bins in total), when I calculate "v", I get v1±σ1, v2±σ2, v3±σ3, v4±σ4. Then I combine these values into one using a weighted average (c stands for combined): v_c = \sum(v_i/\sigma^2_i)/\sum(1/\sigma^2_i), and \sigma_c = 1/\sqrt{\sum(1/\sigma^2_i)} (as can be seen here).
When I do this, it turns out that \sigma_c \simeq \sigma/2. How can this be? I am using the same amount of statistics!

Any reply or idea will be very welcome!

Thank you!

Brais.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey Brais.

The wiki article looks straight-forward, but perhaps you could just outline your calculations in a little more detail step by step to show the simplifications and assumptions you used.
 
Hi, thanks for your reply!
I am calculating a fit. If I put all my data together I get an error that is higher than that of fitting different sets of points separately and then combining them with a weighted mean.
I didn't do any simplification, just applied the expression seen in wikipedia.

Brais
 
Brais said:
I didn't do any simplification, just applied the expression seen in wikipedia.
Brais

You are using a formula from that article that applies when you know the standard deviations of the distributions that are involved, but I'd guess that you don't. Your \sigma_i are probably estimators of standard deviations that you computed from the sample. (The term "standard deviation" is ambiguous. It has at least 5 different meanings in statistics, depending on the context where it appears.)
 
Following Stephen Tashi's post, you should probably just clarify exactly what attribute you are using.
 
Hi again!

A long time ago I had to stop this analysis and so my doubt wasn't importantr for some time :)
I use the errors that my minimization algorithm "MINUIT" gives. Unfortunatelly I cannot find anything except that it (obviously) calculates a covariance matrix and error matrix...

Thanks,

Brais
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top