[Statistics] Factorisation theorem proof

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding a step in the proof of the factorization theorem, specifically the justification for the equality f_{T(X)}(t|\theta) = ∑_{tilde{x}:T(tilde{x}) = t} f_X(tilde{x}|\theta). Participants clarify that this equality arises from the definitions of the involved notations and the principle that the probability of an event can be expressed as the sum of probabilities of mutually exclusive events. The event T(X) = t corresponds to values of X that yield the same outcome for T(X), allowing for the summation of probabilities. An example illustrates this concept, reinforcing the connection between the theorem and the partitioning of events. The discussion concludes with a confirmation of understanding regarding the justification of the equality in question.
Heidrun
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello. I have a question about a step in the factorization theorem demonstration.

1. Homework Statement

Here is the theorem (begins end of page 1), it is not my course but I have almost the same demonstration : http://math.arizona.edu/~jwatkins/sufficiency.pdf
Screenshot of it:
591799factorization.png


Homework Equations


Could someone please explain me how to justify the first equality of that step?
891254factorization2.png


The Attempt at a Solution


I think a possible justification is because the sample is a sufficient statistic but it feels like it's not enough/not the right justification
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Heidrun said:
Could someone please explain me how to justify the first equality of that step?
891254factorization2.png

The first equality is f_{T(X)}(t|\theta) = \sum_{\tilde{x}:T(\tilde{x}) = t} f_X(\tilde{x}|\theta). \ Is that what you're asking about ?
 
Stephen Tashi said:
The first equality is f_{T(X)}(t|\theta) = \sum_{\tilde{x}:T(\tilde{x}) = t} f_X(\tilde{x}|\theta). \ Is that what you're asking about ?

Yes exactly. I don't see why we can write it.
 
That equality is due to the definitions associated with the notation being used plus the fact that the probability of an event can be expressed as the sum of the probabilities of events that partition it into mutually exclusive sets.

f_{T(X)}(t|\theta) denotes the probability density of the discrete random variable T(X) on the probability space "X given \theta".

The event T(X) = t in that probability space is exactly the event that X takes on some value that makes T(X) = t. The notation "\tilde{x}: T(\tilde{x}) = t denotes that event expressed in terms of a variable \tilde{x}. The notation f_X(\tilde{X}|\theta) says we are assigning probability to that event using the probability density function defined on the probability space of "X given \theta".

For example, if event A can be partititoned into mutually exclusive events A1, A2 then p(A) = p(A1) + p(A2). If A is the event T(X) = 4 and this can be partitioned into the mutually exclusive events X = 2 and X = -2 then f_{T(X)} (4) = f_X(2) + f_X(-2).
 
  • Like
Likes Heidrun
Allright thanks a lot!
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K