Stats: Need help understanding where the sum of x^2 comes from

  • Thread starter Thread starter smaan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stats Sum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the calculation of the sum of squares, specifically Sum(x^2). The user is confused about how to derive values like 2431.72, 4901.66, and 3252.44 from their data. It is clarified that to find Sum(x), one must add the values directly, while for Sum(x^2), each value should be squared first and then summed. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying these mathematical operations to obtain the desired results. Understanding these steps is crucial for accurately performing statistical calculations.
smaan
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have no idea where the sum of x^2 comes from, from the information I posted. I know it must be something pretty simple but its completely going over my head. In the picture that I've attached, I am wondering where the 2431.72, 4901.66, and 3252.44 come from. Thank you for any help.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • stats.JPG
    stats.JPG
    28 KB · Views: 477
Physics news on Phys.org
What did you try to get Sum(x)? Sum(x^2)?
 
SteamKing said:
What did you try to get Sum(x)? Sum(x^2)?

I tried squaring x, but obviously that is not correct.
 
Did you try, you know, adding up the columns of figures? That's what Sum(x) means. The other one is trickier: you've got to square each number, and then add them up.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top