Steady State Error of a PI Controlled System (parabolic input)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the appropriate Ki value for a PI-controlled robotic joint system to achieve a steady state error (ess) of 5% for a parabolic input. The calculated Ki value is approximately 0.0011917, but the user encountered issues in their Simulink model, where the system showed no steady state error unless Ki was set to zero. Questions raised include the correctness of the parabolic input representation, the modeling of the PI controller, the relevance of external disturbances, and the method for determining Kp after finding Ki. Participants provided guidance on modeling techniques and suggested using tools like sisotool for verification.
Saam
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey guys/gals,

The block diagram attached is a PI controlled robotic joint system where:

G(s)=Kp+(Ki/s)
P(s)=48500/(s^2+2.89s)

R(s)= joint’s desired angular position
C(s)= joint’s angular position
D(s)= external disturbance
G(s)= PI controller
ess= Steady State Error

My problem:
A) Find the value Ki that will result in ess=5% for a parabolic input.
B) Using this value of Ki find the range of Kp for closed-loop stability.

My solution:

ess=1/Ka=0.05

Ka=lim(s>0) s^2G(s)P(s)=20

G(s)P(s)=((sKp+Ki)/s)(48500/(s^2+2.89s))
=(48500sKp+48500Ki)/(s^3+2.89s^2)
=(48500sKp+48500Ki)/(s^2(s+2.89))

Ka=48500Ki/2.89=20
Ki=20*2.89/48500
Ki=0.0011917

I tried using this Ki value in my Simulink model (other attachment) but the system didn’t have any steady state error, and I could only manage to get steady state error by making Ki = 0.
Also, I didn’t know how to insert a parabolic input into Simulink so I used this instead:
Ramp x Ramp x 0.5 to represent (½)t^2

My questions:
1) Is my parabolic input correct?
2) Is my PI controller set out correctly in my Simulink model? (I wasn’t sure how to model the I component)
3) For this part of the question I’ve been ignoring the disturbance (D(s)), it’s not mentioned in this part, is it ok to ignore?
4) Am I going about finding Ki the right way?
5) What path should I take to get Kp after I have Ki? I’m thinking I need to do a Routh array.

Looking for a little nudge toward the right path.

Thanks for the help,
Sam
 

Attachments

  • Q66 diagram.jpg
    Q66 diagram.jpg
    9.6 KB · Views: 1,035
  • simulink.jpg
    simulink.jpg
    20.6 KB · Views: 2,242
Physics news on Phys.org
1) try two transfer function blocks [1/s] in series. (Although I suspect what you're doing is equivalent)

2) It is correct, although there is PID controller block.

3) There is no model of D(s) given so you can assume nothing helpful.

4) Looks like you're on the right track but its too late to check numbers right now.

5)You can do that.

Hint: You can check your answer (or solve the problem) using sisotool.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top