Steam Turbine / Tesla Turbine - bladless rotor in steam turbine?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility and mechanics of using a Tesla turbine, particularly in the context of steam as a working fluid. Participants explore the principles behind the operation of bladeless turbines, the relationship between torque and angular velocity, and the practical challenges of implementing such a system for a final year project.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires whether steam can cause a Tesla turbine to operate similarly to how water does, questioning the necessity of blades for achieving mechanical torque.
  • Another participant suggests that Tesla originally designed the turbine for exhaust gases and believes it could work with steam if the discs are made from quality materials, but raises concerns about potential warping at high RPMs.
  • A participant discusses the relationship between angular velocity and torque, noting that maximum torque occurs just before the turbine starts moving and that high RPMs without load do not guarantee sufficient torque for practical applications.
  • Concerns are raised about the mass flow rate of steam and its impact on the force delivered to the turbine, with a participant providing an example from their experience with a pressure washer to illustrate the limitations of mass flow rates.
  • A mathematical model for predicting mechanical power output from a Tesla turbine is proposed, including variables such as force, number of jets, efficiency, and diameter of the turbine.
  • Another participant, a final year student, seeks assistance regarding the equipment needed for their steam turbine project and expresses a desire for relevant help.
  • A repeated request for help regarding the required nozzle velocity for operating the Tesla turbine is made, indicating a need for specifications related to the prime mover.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the effectiveness of using steam in a Tesla turbine, with some supporting the idea while others raise concerns about practical limitations. There is no consensus on the necessity of blades or the specific requirements for nozzle velocity.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions regarding material properties, mass flow rates, and efficiency coefficients, which may affect the outcomes of their discussions. Specific mathematical steps and definitions are not fully resolved.

Who May Find This Useful

Students and enthusiasts interested in turbine design, steam power applications, and experimental engineering projects may find this discussion relevant.

Tomvader
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,
I am looking into subject matter to use as my final year project at university.
The Tesla Turbine is something that I have recently looked into. I am interested to know the following...

In the Tesla Turbine, water is 'injected' and border interactions of the different molecules cause the rotor discs to spin at high speed. If steam was pressurised and directed onto a bladeless generator ( tESLA tURBINE) would this same phenomena occur?
- or are blades essential in achieving mechanical torque in the case of steam?

thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So far as I know, Tesla invented this turbine for use with exhaust gases.

So yes it should work well provided the discs are made of good quality materials that don't warp. The practical problem may be warped discs that wobble badly at high RPM and cause the turbine to fall apart.

The relationship between angular velocity (rad/s) and torque (N.m) will certainly be interesting. The higher the rpm, the lower the torque and vice versa. Counter-intuitively you will get maximum torque just after applying the steam nozzle to the turbine, and just before the turbine actually starts to move.

In other words, high RPM when it is not under load should not lead you to think it can deliver the torque needed to drive for example a 5kW alternator motor that operates at 200 RPM. Such an alternator would need about 270 N.m of torque to rotate at 200 RPM and deliver 5kW of electrical output.

So getting 3000 RPM from your tesla turbine when it is not under load is by no means the whole picture. Your torque will increase as RPM under load decreases, and if the torque needed to power the alternator is too great, your turbine will come to a standstill.

It is all about the useful work the turbine can do.

I have never tested a Tesla turbine, so I do not speak from experience with what follows. But my immediate concern about steam as a working fluid would be F = m.a

You may get excellent velocity from the steam pipe nozzles (and therefore high RPM when not under load) but the force in Newtons actually delivered to the turbine will I think be limited to the mass in kg per second of the working fluid. It takes a lot of steam to provide a mass of 1 kg.

My best guess (not having worked with Tesla turbines) is that you may have a mass flow rate of less than 0.0001 m3/s.

If so, the force delivered to the turbine will be low in terms of Newtons even if you have more than one steam jet nozzle and even if you manage high jet velocities of over 180 m/s upwards.

By way of example, an electric pressure washer which consumes 3000 watts and delivers 160 bar of pressure (160 bar = 16,000,000 N/m2 = 16,000,000 Pa) might seem to be a great way of powering an impulse turbine.

I tried it out. It didn't work because the mass flow rate (here water) was only about 0.00016 cubic metres per second, so I was getting 28 Newtons of force delivered to the turbine despite a whopping 16,000,000 pascals of pressure from the jet nozzle (at 179 m/s).

Note that the 16,000,000 Pa did not translate to 1600 N of force after I had converted 16,000,000 N/m2 to force actually applied by that pressure over a square centimetre on a small turbine cup. It is easy to make unit errors if you don't take F = m.a into account.

This leads neatly on to the question of mechanical power output in watts. The whole point of any self respecting turbine.

If you want to use RPM instead of radians per second, the following equation just might work for a tesla turbine as a mathematical model to predict mechanical power output in watts (which should be equivalent to the electrical power output in watts if you were to hook it to an appropriate alternator motor/generator).

Pmech (watts) = Fjet x Njet x pi x h x w x d / 60Fjet = Force in Newtons

Njet = number of jets eg 1 steam nozzle

pi = 3.141592654

h = efficiency coefficient (unit-less fraction) = eg 0.9 (it is probably going to be a figure between 0.7 and 0.9)

d = diameter of turbine in metres (circle representing the pitch circle diameter of the turbine, or in other words a circle whose diameter represents the point where the jet strikes the circular turbine which will not necessarily be the outermost tip of the turbine)

w = rpm (here not rad/s) = eg 3000 rpm

Good luck with testing. Working with turbines is the most fun you will ever have.
 
Last edited:
Hi every one!
My name is Arshad mehmood. final year student at FUUAST islamabad. and i m going to make steam turbine as my final year project, Relevant help about steam turbine is accepted
especially what equipments is to be used in this all this i need.thanks to every one
 
Engr Arshad said:
Hi every one!
My name is Arshad mehmood. final year student at FUUAST islamabad. and i m going to make steam turbine as my final year project, Relevant help about steam turbine is accepted
especially what equipments is to be used in this all this i need.thanks to every one

Welcome to PF! A quick google search for "building a steam turbine" should give you plenty of information to work with, and will be much easier than someone trying to explain it to you through posts here. If you have any questions on specific aspects of a steam engine feel free to ask though!
 
hii guys...can nebdy help me out...i jst want to know how mch velocity is required from nozzle in order to run the tesla tturbine or the specifications of prime mover i.e. pump for jet velocity.??
thnks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K