Steel Top + Magnet: Does It Matter?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pokk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnet Steel
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the effects of an electromagnet on a spinning steel top compared to a non-spinning one. It raises questions about the induced currents in the top due to its motion and how these currents might interact with the magnetic field, potentially affecting the attraction between the magnet and the top. The conversation suggests that the dynamics change when the top is spinning, as it introduces additional energy and magnetic interactions. There's speculation on whether a spinning top connected to a mechanical energy source would allow the magnet to approach it without contact, due to the top's induced magnetic field. Overall, the interaction between the magnet and the spinning top presents a complex scenario worth testing.
pokk
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
a steel top which remains upright when not spinning has an electromagnet pulling on it from the side. Q=does it make any diff how much the emagnet moves the top sideways if the top is spinning or not? Please dirregard the friction factor at the bottom point of the top. thanx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At first, I thought No; but then,

I started to wonder what is really happening, I mean, for as long as there is motion, there might be some currents being induced in the top as it spins but I have not put much thought into what the boundary conditions are, whether they are symmetric or not and what the currents might be...the relative motion of the steel is in one direction between the magnet and the center of the top and in the other direction after the center of the top

needless to say, these induced current should tend to stop the rotation of the top (no perpetual motion machine here) but that is beside the point, the point is that without rotation the attraction is what it is, with motion you now have the extra interaction between the two magnetic field, the magnet' s and the one from the induced currents, whether the effect of the induced current's magnetic field from both sides of the top simply cancel each other out and does not affect the attraction ...that, I wouldn't know at this time.

...just thinking aloud
 
i didnt consider rotational slowing as possible energy loss. Was just wondering if the 2 tops would move differently due to spin factor...keep thinking aloud
 
By definition, I would have to say that the attraction is going a bit different with the spinning top...I mean, they are not even the same system...one of them has an additional energy input...the attraction will have to be disturbed one way or another due to the currents induced in the spinning top and the interaction between the magnet's field and the induced current's field.

If you put a magnet and the non-spinning top in front of it...the magnet will attract the top until they are in contact. No doubt about that.

Or, if the top cannot be moved, the magnet will drag itself until it is in contact with the non-spinning top (bear with me).

No, let's say that instead of sending the spinning top off on its own, let's say that we actually connect a shaft to it, so that we can keep spinning it all the time (inputting mechanical energy all the time)...would the magnet drag itself all the way until it touches the top? I think it would come close and then stop without touching, since the spinning top will have a magnetic field of its own! ...assuming a nice uniform magnetic field going up and the top spinning clockwise, I think the magnetic field of the top would be going to the right thru the top and coming back around through the outside of the top.

Maybe this can be easily tested by taking two magnets and placing one perpendicular to the north pole of the other one...do they get together without hesitation? or not? Try that...I don't have magnet handy here.
 
yes, put the top on a motor & let the magnet do the moving.....lemme know what happens,lol, +VVV
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top