Could Genetics Enable a World Where Only Women Reproduce?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jk22
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Genetics may allow for the combination of RNA from two oocytes to create a fertilized egg, potentially enabling reproduction without male involvement. While this has been demonstrated in animals, it remains illegal and untested in humans. The concept raises questions about societal structure, as a world with only women would differ significantly, but it does not imply that heterosexual relationships would cease to exist. Many women still prefer to have families with men, and the idea that a female-only society would be better is debated. Overall, while the science is intriguing, the implications for society are complex and speculative.
jk22
Messages
732
Reaction score
25
Could it be that genetics permits to make the mix of two oocytes rna to make a new fertilized egg ?

This would lead to a kind of brave new world where only women are needed ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you mean DNA then yes, it is technically possible and we've been capable of doing it for quite a while:

http://news.sciencemag.org/2001/07/egg-fertilized-without-sperm

As far as I'm aware it's never been done in humans, being illegal in most nations. As for a "brave new world" I'd be extremely wary about using that term as the original story had a huge amount of depth and social commentary that may not apply in this case.
 
What i mean is that we take two eggs from different females they both contain half the code and put all in one egg, does it fertilize ?

A society were there are only females would indeed be quite different. But would it be better ? No men for hard works for example.
 
Last edited:
jk22 said:
What i mean is that we take two eggs from different females they both contain half the code and put all in one egg, does it fertilize ?

As shown in the link above it had been done in animals, it's fairly likely it's possible in humans too.

jk22 said:
A society were there are only females would indeed be quite different. But would it be better ? No men for hard works for example.

The fact that two women could have a biological child in no way implies that society would suddenly be all female. That's utterly ludicrous, you realize that most women are heterosexual and choose to start families with men? If this technology was approved for couples who wanted it it would not stop the large majority of children born to heterosexual couples.

In addition women are also capable of hard work, whilst men might be on average stronger that does not mean we have total dominion over manual labour. Especially given that much of modern manual labour is tool using.
 
Well it is not a sudden change but something on the long term and it remains science-fiction. Such a society would be quite boring I suppose since it would be asexual moreover.
it is difficult to find a good idea for social fiction.
 
Last edited:
We've just had an interesting thread about generation ships, but I don't think that that is the most reasonable way to colonize another planet. Fatal problems: - Crew may become chaotic and self destructive. - Crew may become so adapted to space as to be unwilling to return to a planet. - Making the planet habitable may take longer then the trip, so the ship needs to last far longer than just the journey. - Mid-flight malfunction may render the ship unable to decelerate at the destination...
I know this topic is extremely contraversial and debated, but I'm writing a book where an AI attempts to become as human as possible. Would it, eventually, especially in the far future, be possible for an AI to gain a conscious? To be clear, my definition of a consciousness being the ability to possess self-created morals, thoughts, and views, AKA a whole personality. And if this is possible (and let's just say it is for this question), about how long may it take for something to happen...
This is a question for people who know about astrophysics. It's been said that the habitable zones around red dwarf stars are so close to those stars that any planets in the zones would be tidally locked to the stars in question. With one side roasting and another side freezing almost forever, those planets wouldn't be hospitable to life. a) Could there be forms of life--whole ecologies--that first evolve in the planet's twilight zone and then extend their habitat by burrowing...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Back
Top