Stirling's Formula: How does n relate to n^n.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ryuky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
Ryuky
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello all.
I am doing a school paper on Stirling's formula and I want first to show how the factor e comes into place. So I found somewhere on the net the definition n! = (1-1/2)×(1-1/3)2... × (1-1/n)n-1] × nn.

I will then use this result and the definition of e^x since we are talking for large n to proceed.

Homework Statement


Problem is, how do I prove it? Although I haven't tried induction yet, I was told that I should find an algebraic method.

I don't want a complete solution, just a hint to guide me through the proof.

Thank you
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First represent all the 1-.5 and 1-1/3 by (1-1/n+1)^n, we note this is (n/(n+1))^n.
Now note what happens as we multiply this for different n's:
(1/2)^1 * (2/3)^2 * (3/4)^3... = (1^1 * 2^2 * 3^3...)/(2^1 * 3^2 * 4^3...).
Do you notice what is happening? Try canceling things up, in problems like this, I recommend you put things in variables like I did (n/(n+1)) in our case.Thanks, Bonaparte
 
Last edited:
Bonaparte said:
First represent all the 1-.5 and 1-1/3 by (1-1/n+1)^n, we note this is (n/(n+1))^n.
Now note what happens as we multiply this for different n's:
(1/2)^1 * (2/3)^2 * (3/4)^3... = (1^1 * 2^2 * 3^3...)/(2^1 * 3^2 * 4^3...).
Do you notice what is happening? Try canceling things up, in problems like this, I recommend you put things in variables like I did (n/(n+1))^n in our case.Thanks, Bonaparte

Thank you for your response. I got it now, the fraction reduces to n!/(n+1)^n = Product from 1 to n of (n/(n+1))^n which leads to n!=(n+1)^n * the Product, but then the last term of the product cancels out with (n+1)^n and so comes the required result.

However, I am still interested on how you derived it. I mean, suppose we had absolutely no clue on how does n^n relate to n!. How would we then, think of this relationship? What steps would we have to take?
 
The relationship between n^n and n! is ruled by their definition. Now that I think about it a clearer way to have stated this is instead of n/n+1 (where we have to change n^n to (n+1)^n) is to state it in their way (1-1/n)^(n-1).
Then we have ((n-1)/n)^(n-1). Then proceed as before, although now it will be clearer. Considering your writing a paper about it, I recommend the second way.

As for your question, I derived it by look at the numbers, seeing the pattern (which is not even necessary considering its given) and implementing it into numbers.

Thanks and good luck, Bonaparte
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top