Stoichiometry: Calculating Mass of HCl Neutralized by Milk of Magnesia

  • Thread starter Thread starter FLgirl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stoichiometry
AI Thread Summary
Magnesium hydroxide in milk of magnesia neutralizes stomach acid, specifically HCl, through a chemical reaction. The calculation presented attempts to determine the mass of HCl neutralized by 3.26g of Mg(OH)2 but yields an incorrect result. The correct approach involves converting the mass of Mg(OH)2 to moles, then using stoichiometry to find the corresponding mass of HCl. The discussion highlights the importance of verifying molar masses for accurate calculations. Accurate stoichiometric calculations are essential for determining the neutralization capacity of magnesium hydroxide.
FLgirl
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
1. Magnesium hydroxide, the active ingredient in milk of magnesia, neutralizes stomach acid, primarily HCl, according to the following reaction:

Mg(OH)2(aq) + 2 HCl(aq) ---> 2 H2O(l) + MgCl2(aq)

What mass of HCl, in grams, can be neutralized by a dose of milk of magnesia caontaining 3.26g Mg(OH)2?




2. Mass A --> Amount A(in moles) --> Amount B(in moles) --> Mass B



3. The Attempt at a Solution : 3.26g Mg(OH)2 X 1mol Mg(OH)2 /34.01g Mg(OH)2 X 2 mol HCl/ 1 mol Mg(OH)2 X 36.46g HCl/ 1 molg HCl = 6.99


which is wrong, like I thought it would be. what's the right way to do this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This forum really is so unhelpful.
 
Nobody answered in 2 hours and you already know we are unhelpful?

I have already answered your question elsewhere, is there a need to repeat it here? Check your molar masses.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top