What Is the Molarity of the Oxalic Acid Solution in This RedOx Reaction?

AI Thread Summary
Oxalic acid (H2C2O4) reacts with dichromate ion (Cr2O7^2-) in an acidic solution, producing carbon dioxide and chromium(III) ion. To find the molarity of the oxalic acid solution, the balanced reaction equation indicates that 9 moles of oxalic acid react with 1 mole of dichromate. Calculating the moles of dichromate from a 0.0100 M solution yields 0.00025 moles, leading to 0.00225 moles of oxalic acid. Dividing this by the volume of the oxalic acid solution (50 mL) gives a molarity of 0.045 M. The initial error was due to incorrectly using CrO7 instead of the correct Cr2O7.
salman213
Messages
301
Reaction score
1
1. Oxalic acid, H2C2O4, reacts with dichromate ion, in acidic solution to produce carbon dioxide and chromium(III) ion.
If exactly 50.0 mL of an oxalic acid solution is required to react completely with 25.0 mL of a 0.0100 M dichromate solution, what is the molarity of the oxalic acid solution?




2. Molarity = Moles/Lsolution




3. well the equation i got was
H2C2O4 + CrO7 (2-)---> Cr (3+) + CO2

I used oxidation method to balance it to

9H2C2O4 + CrO7 ---> Cr + 7H2O + 4H + 18CO2


then i found moles of CrO7

molarity x L solution = 0.01 x (25/1000) = 0.00025 mol CrO7

then moles of H2C2O4 = 0.00025 mol CrO7 x 9 moles/1 mole

= 0.00225 moles H2C2O4


using this i divide by L solution to get molarity?

M = 0.00225 / (50/1000)

=0.045 M

But according to my online assignment i put that in and its WRONG :(

Maybe i balanced incorrectly or I am doing something else wrong
please help!







[/b]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
never mind i found my mistake i was using

CrO7 but obviously it is Cr2O7 :D::D:D thanks !
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top