Stoichiometry, Part II (and Percentage Yield)

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on stoichiometry and percentage yield, a participant calculated the expected yield of ethanoic acid from ethanol, starting with 360g of ethanol and achieving a 70% yield. They derived an actual value of approximately 469.28g of ethanoic acid but were confused about distinguishing between actual and expected values. The calculations for a second scenario, where 149g of ethanol produced 180g of ethanoic acid, suggested a percentage yield of about 92.67%. Participants confirmed the calculations but highlighted the need for clarity on theoretical versus actual yields. The overall focus was on ensuring accurate understanding and application of stoichiometric principles in yield calculations.
Soaring Crane
Messages
461
Reaction score
0
Please (pretty please) check all of my work!

1) In an oxidation reaction, ethanol (C2H5OH) is converted to a ethanoic acid (C2H4O2) with a percentage yield of 70%. If you start the reaction with 360g of ethanol, how many grams of ethanoic acid would you expect to produce?
Stoichiometry is 1:1 between the compounds.

% yield = (actual value/expected value) *100

Given: % yield = 70

Find: expected value C2H4O2 in g

Actual value C2H4O2 in g:
360 g C2H5OH (1 mol C2H5OH / 46.068 g C2H5OH) (1 mol C2H4O2 / 1 mol C2H5OH) = 7.81454 mol C2H4O2

7.81454 mol C2H4O2 (60.052 g C2H4O2 / 1 mol C2H4O2) = 469.2785 g C2H4O2 = actual value ??

70 = (469.2785/expected) * 100
expected = 469.2785/.70 = 670 g C2H4O2 ??

Did I muddle this problem big time? I'm confused with what is the actual value and what is the expected (theoretical?) value. Did I confuse the actual for the expected?? Do you use 70% at all?


2) In an oxidation reaction, ethanol (C2H5OH) is converted to a ethanoic acid (C2H4O2). In an Experiment, a chemist starts with 149.00g of ethanol and forms 180.00g of ethanoic acid. What is the percentage yield of the reaction? Stoichiometry of the reaction is 1:1 for the mentioned compounds.


% yield = (actual value/expected value) *100

Given: 180.00 g C2H4O2 = actual value g C2H4O2 ?

Expected value of C2H4O2 :
149.00 g C2H5OH (1 mol C2H5OH / 46.068 g C2H5OH) (1 mol C2H4O2 / 1 mol C2H5OH) (60.052 g C2H4O2 / 1 mol C2H4O2) = 194.2291 g C2H4O2 ??

180 g / 194.2291 g C2H4O2 *(100) = 92.674 % ??

Gosh, I hope I didn't confuse my values or molar masses again!

Thank you. I am desperate for help. :cry:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone at all? Please? (Are my calculations correct?)

Thanks.
 
Please confirm if I did something correctly.

Thanks for your patience.
 
Your calculations look correct to me.:smile:
 
7.81454 mol C2H4O2 (60.052 g C2H4O2 / 1 mol C2H4O2) = 469.2785 g C2H4O2 = actual value ??

70 = (469.2785/expected) * 100
expected = 469.2785/.70 = 670 g C2H4O2 ??

Did I muddle this problem big time? I'm confused with what is the actual value and what is the expected (theoretical?) value. Did I confuse the actual for the expected?? Do you use 70% at all?
what you calculated here is the theoretical yield, now how is your theoretical yield less then you're actual percent yield? Think about it.

2) seems fine
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top