Strange ice formation, gravity-defying ?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the formation of an inverted icicle, or ice stalagmite, observed in a mug of water left outside in freezing temperatures in Edinburgh. Participants explore the phenomenon, noting that it lacks a visible source of dripping water, which adds to its intrigue. References to previous discussions and scientific papers on "ice spikes" provide explanations for the occurrence, suggesting that this is a documented natural phenomenon. The original poster acknowledges the existence of these resources and expresses gratitude for the community's input. Overall, the thread highlights curiosity about unusual ice formations and the scientific explanations behind them.
murrmac
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Can anybody explain how this inverted icicle could have come to be formed ?

This mug of water had been sitting outside for a few days, last night the temperature in Edinburgh dropped to below zero, and this morning I saw that this ice stalagmite had formed.

There was no source of dripping water which could have caused this, is there a simple physical explanation for what I see as a strange phenomenon ?

This is not a hoax or wind-up btw, there was no fakery involved, and this is a genuine untouched picture, ( I have taken the mug inside and put it in my freezer to preserve it )

icicleh.jpg


EDIT: I see that this is not the first time this has been posted on the Forum , this thread from two years ago https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=273135 contains a useful link to a paper in which the phenomenon is discussed and explained at some length.

As I might have guessed, if you search for "ice spike" on Youtube, there are several videos there depicting ice spikes of various shapes and sizes.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
jarednjames said:
If you read the link poster by mender (http://www.its.caltech.edu/~atomic/snowcrystals/icespikes/icespikes.htm) in the thread you linked to, it explains them perfectly. You answered your own question.

Yes, I did read, and understand, the material in the link to which you refer.

Hence my posting the EDIT to the first post, in which I included the sentence :

..."https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=273135 contains a useful link to a paper in which the phenomenon is discussed and explained at some length" ...

Maybe I should just have deleted the entire post ?
 
murrmac said:
Maybe I should just have deleted the entire post ?

No! Thanks for not doing that.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top