Strategies for Solving Uniform Motion Problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter Amano
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion Uniform
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a uniform motion problem involving hiking and riding back home at different speeds. The problem states that the hiking time is 5 hours longer than the riding time, with specific speeds given for each leg of the journey. One member shares their method using algebraic equations, while another suggests using a table to organize the information, which can simplify the process. Both approaches ultimately lead to the same algebraic equation, but the table method may help clarify the relationships between distance, speed, and time. The conversation emphasizes the importance of finding effective strategies to tackle such problems.
Amano
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The member of a girls club hiked to lake tenkiller at 2 mph. Then they got a ride back home at 12 mph. Find their hiking time if it was 5 hours longer than their riding time. How far was it to the lake?

Now I know this is a simple question. Very easy. But the reason I write this one out is not for help. But I want better knowledge on better was to do this question.


2.Relevant equations

Can't add anything here I don't think.

The Attempt at a Solution



I just want to know how many ways I can do this question. I know there is one with graphs that you can do to answer this question. Are there others?

The way I have been taught to do this question by my textbook is this way.


Dh Dh=Dr RhTh= RrTr
-------->
Dr
<------- Rh=2 Rr=12 Th=Tr+5

2[Tr+5]= 12Tr

2Tr+10 = 12Tr
10 = 10Tr
Tr = 1


Th= Tr+5
Th= 6hr

Thus the distance will = 12 miles when 6 is multiplied by the 2.

Now that is the way I have been doing it. My only trouble is that I dont' see there is any reason to do so much algebra. so when I skimp of some of the writing like this.

2T+10 = 12T And I find this work quite well. But I find that you can get easily confused at times depending on what is going on, with the question and it's wording.

So what would some of you guys do?

Cheers,
Amano

p.s sorry if I post this in the wrong place.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF :smile:

These problems can also be done by making a table:

Code:
                  Distance     Avg speed     Time
Up Mountain                        2          t+5
Ride home                         12          t
Total trip     ***not relevant***

Then you can use the relation
Distance = Speed × Time​
and go from there.

You get the same algebraic equation, but often the table helps to organize things better. Especially in problems where the combined total trip comes into play, though it didn't this time.
 
Hi,
Thanks for the reply. It looks much better than the [to me clumsy.] way I was setting them out.

Cheers for your help.

Amano
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top