Stream functions and flow around sphere/cylinder

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter member 428835
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flow Functions Stream
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the definitions of velocity in polar and spherical coordinates, specifically the equations $$\vec{V} = \nabla \times \frac{\psi(r,z)}{r} \vec{e_\theta}$$ and $$\vec{V} = \nabla \times \frac{\psi(r,\phi)}{r \sin \phi} \vec{e_\theta}$$. The division by ##r## and ##r \sin \phi## is established as a method to simplify subsequent equations, despite the complexity of spherical coordinates. The discussion also touches on the use of different symbols for angles, indicating a potential source of confusion in notation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically curl operations.
  • Familiarity with polar and spherical coordinate systems.
  • Knowledge of fluid dynamics concepts, particularly velocity fields.
  • Proficiency in mathematical notation and manipulation of equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study vector calculus applications in fluid dynamics.
  • Learn about the implications of coordinate transformations in physics.
  • Explore the derivation of velocity fields in various coordinate systems.
  • Investigate common notational conventions in mathematical physics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in fluid dynamics, as well as mathematicians interested in vector calculus and coordinate systems.

member 428835
Hi PF!

I am wondering why we define velocity for polar coordinates as $$\vec{V} = \nabla \times \frac{\psi(r,z)}{r} \vec{e_\theta}$$ and why we define velocity in spherical coordinates as $$\vec{V} = \nabla \times \frac{\psi(r,\phi)}{r \sin \phi} \vec{e_\theta}$$

The only thing I don't understand is why we divide by ##r## and then ##r \sin \phi## (which are really sort of the same dimension, just the spherical is a projection). Is this simply to make the equations that follow nicer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it's because your equations become simpler, although your spherical coordinates are strange. I'd expect (with ##\vartheta## the polar and ##\varphi## the azimuthal angles)
$$\vec{v}=\vec{\nabla} \times \left (\frac{\psi(r,\vartheta)}{r \sin \vartheta} \vec{e}_{\varphi} \right).$$
Then you get
$$\vec{v}=\vec{e}_r \frac{1}{r^2 \sin \vartheta} \partial_{\vartheta} \psi-\vec{e}_{\vartheta} \frac{1}{r \sin \vartheta} \partial_r \psi.$$
 
Shoot, we may be using a different symbols for different angles. Awesome, thanks for your response!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K