Strength/Weakness of Each Method to Collect Earth data

  • Thread starter Thread starter RJLiberator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Data Earth Method
AI Thread Summary
Magnetic Line of Force techniques are easy to collect but suffer from a significant limitation in data acquisition, as they only provide north/west data, omitting east/west information. In contrast, geomagnetism offers precise measurements of magnetic anomalies in the seafloor, benefiting from the hard-coded nature of the data. However, the discussion indicates a need for clarity on the challenges of collecting marine data, suggesting that logistical difficulties may be a concern. The focus is on understanding these methods in the context of studying the movement of the India plate. Overall, each method presents unique strengths and weaknesses that impact the effectiveness of Earth data collection.
RJLiberator
Gold Member
Messages
1,094
Reaction score
63

Homework Statement



Name a strength and weakness of each technique.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



The two techniques that I came up with are:

Magnetic Line of Force in rocks to analyze land-based paleomagnetic data.
Strength: Well, it's easy to collect. [need help here]
Weakness: Data collected by this method results in a loss of data as we do not acquire east/west data but only north/west data.

Geomagnetism --> To measure magnetic anomalies of the sea-floor. This was marine based data.
Strength: We get exact results as the information is hard-coded into the seafloor.
Weakness: Don't have a good idea yet. I initially said that the data was difficult to collect, but that isn't the answer we were looking for. [help here?]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is "Earth data"?
 
:P I didn't have room in the title to properly demonstrate what I needed. But by the title, I mean, We are looking at each method for strengths/weaknesses to collect data sets for movement of the India plate.
 
Regarding a weakness of paleomagnetism think in terms of plate tectonics and how that affects the oceanic crust.
 
  • Like
Likes RJLiberator
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top