Stress strain curve for concrete in Eurocode

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of the stress-strain curve for concrete as specified in the Eurocode, particularly the relationship between the peak stress values (fck and fcm) and their implications for finite element simulations. Participants are exploring the definitions and labeling of these values in the context of concrete strength and testing methodologies.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the peak of the stress-strain curve is labeled as fcm (average compressive strength) instead of fck (characteristic compressive strength), suggesting a lack of clarity in the labeling.
  • Another participant explains that the peak stress in lab tests is typically higher than fck, with fcm representing the average peak stress, and that fck is used for design to ensure a 95 percent confidence level in failure stress.
  • A different participant notes that the Eurocode mentions fcm in the same context as the OP's diagram, and discusses the potential meaning of fcu as related to ultimate strain rather than peak stress.
  • One participant elaborates on the relationship between fck and fcm, indicating that while some samples may fail at fck, most will exceed this value, thus justifying the use of fcm for average peak stress in design considerations.
  • There is a mention of differences in practices between regions, such as the approach taken in the United States regarding concrete strength specifications and testing outcomes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing interpretations of the stress-strain curve labels and their implications. There is no consensus on the correct interpretation of fck, fcm, and fcu, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the labeling and its implications for concrete modeling.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various editions of the Eurocode, suggesting that there may be differences in terminology or definitions across versions. The discussion also highlights the complexity of concrete testing and the variability in sample performance.

Sadeq
Messages
103
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I am doing simulation using Finite element for the concrete ,this I found the concrete model for the concrete in euro code as attached in the picture.

But what I don't understand is basically why the peak of the curve is not the Fck (compressive strength), because the curve maximum is fcm(average compressive strength).

So if I need to use the curve ,this doesn't make sense to me

Please anyone clarity this point for me.

The peak should be fck not the average?

Thank you all
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/czf1c
 
That curve appears incorrectly labeled. The peak stress is the stress at failure under increasing compressive load in a lab tests. Approximately 5 percent of samples of a grade of concrete would fail at a peak stress of fck or fcu, or less, while 95 percent would fail at a peak stress of greater than fck, with average peak stress of those samples being fcm. The peak stress for design is considered fck, giving a 95 percent confidence level that the peak failure stress will occur at fck or greater. Now to achieve the post peak response, the tests must be conducted by slowly controlling deformation instead of load, because by increasing load to failure, the specimen breaks at peak, and post peak response is lost. Post peak, the stress is reduced as strain increases, until an ultomaye strain is reached. While this stress value is lower than the peak stress, and cannot be called fck. The peak value is fck or greater, more like fcm on average. Fcm is always greater than fck , by 25 percent or so.
 
Jay said "That curve appears incorrectly labelled." . I looked at the code and it mentions fcm in the same place as the OP's diagram, at the top. The final stress, labelled as fcu in the OP's figure is not mentioned in my code diagram from EN 1992-1-1 2004. There may be a later edition. However, you might think that "cu" might originate from "compression" and "ultimate", and the code uses these subscripts at the ultimate strain.
 
pongo38 said:
Jay said "That curve appears incorrectly labelled." . I looked at the code and it mentions fcm in the same place as the OP's diagram, at the top. The final stress, labelled as fcu in the OP's figure is not mentioned in my code diagram from EN 1992-1-1 2004. There may be a later edition. However, you might think that "cu" might originate from "compression" and "ultimate", and the code uses these subscripts at the ultimate strain.
if fcu represents the compression strength at ultimate strain, then I agree that label is correct. I was interpreting fcu as the peak stress when testing is done on a cube sample instead of a cylinder, which yields values higher than fck, but I have minimum familiarity with Eurocode.

Regarding the peak stress, it is my understanding thst fcm is the average peak stress where most samples will fracture under increasing load. However, since a small fraction of samples will fail at a lower value, fck, fck is used as the fracture stress for safety. Thus, a Grade 30 mix will sometimes fail at 30 MPa, fck at peak, but most of the time it fails at 40 MPa or so, fcm at peak. When Grade 30 concrete is specified, the water/cement ratio is adjusted to shoot for fcm at peak of around 40 MPa, and if a few samples ( 1 in 20) fail at arpund 30 MPa, no one sweats over it, since design is based anyway on fck with a safety factor . As I understand it. In the States, I order 4000 psi concrete but design for 3000 psi. This way , if a sample tests after pour at below 4000 psi, I don't have to initiate a lawsuit against the supplier, who will only claim anyeay that the testing or curing of the cylinders in the field was
not done properly.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
88K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K