Dark Energy: Is Stretching Space-Time the Answer?

J7H18
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello anyone who can answer. I have a question concerning dark energy (Please realize that my knowledge is limited on this subject)

It is known that the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate, scientists say this is due to the mysterious dark energy. It seems to go against our understanding of gravity, shouldn't the universe be expanding at a decelerating rate?

What if at a certain amount of density (say black holes!) of matter space time is stretched (we know it can be warped, we think there can be waves, so why can't it be stretched?)

This might explain why the universe is accelerating, its just space getting bigger. It might also explain why its only expanding on a large scale (in addition to the other forces, such as electromagnetism, that are greater than it at a small scale). It might just be the relationship between black holes.

Maybe dark energy is just a strange aspect of general relativity. Instead the warping of space-time, it is the stretching of space time due to large, possibly infinite, amounts of density.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
J7H18 said:
shouldn't the universe be expanding at a decelerating rate?
That's exactly the problem that dark energy was invented to solve.

You say space is getting bigger. That's just another way of saying space is expanding, and is just begging the question.

Dark energy is included in general relativity as the cosmological constant term.
 
  • Like
Likes J7H18
Interesting. In what way do you imply it is stretched?

It is also possible that at the rate space expands (in its early stages, faster than light. and constantly increasing speed) makes it immune to gravity. Not to say the universe's expansion breaks the laws of physics, only that at any speed faster than light, the force of expansion is greater than the sum of all gravitational pulls in the universe. And because of that, it can constantly increase acceleration (assuming that is the nature of things that move FTL; there is more acceleration for every less gravitation)
 
  • Like
Likes J7H18
Just to be sure I am understanding you right, could you give an example? (such as the rubber sheet example)
 
Thanks you for the response! This makes more since.
 
The Un-Observer said:
It is also possible that at the rate space expands (in its early stages, faster than light. and constantly increasing speed) makes it immune to gravity.

I suppose this is "possible" in principle, but it's not what happens. (Also, the universe's expansion is accelerating now, so whatever we use to explain it can't be something that only applies in the "early stages".)

The Un-Observer said:
at any speed faster than light, the force of expansion is greater than the sum of all gravitational pulls in the universe.

This is misstated in two ways. First of all, the "accelerated" expansion, which we think is explained by dark energy, does not require "faster than light" expansion; it works just fine at any expansion rate. Second, there is no "force of expansion"; all the objects in the universe whose relative motion is described as "accelerating expansion" are in free fall, feeling no force.

With those misstatements corrected, it is true that the accelerating expansion can be viewed as the effect of dark energy (which makes expansion accelerate) being larger than the effect of ordinary matter (which makes the expansion decelerate). Up until a few billion years ago, it was the other way around: the effect of ordinary matter was larger than the effect of dark energy, so the expansion was decelerating. But as the universe expands, the density of ordinary matter decreases, so its effect on the expansion rate also decreases, while the density of dark energy remains constant. By a few billion years ago, the density of ordinary matter had decreased to the point where its effect became smaller than that of dark energy. When that happened, the expansion stopped decelerating and began to accelerate.
 
  • Like
Likes J7H18
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...

Similar threads

Back
Top