String Theory and Supersymmetry

atyy
Science Advisor
Messages
15,170
Reaction score
3,379
Cargese lectures on string theory with eight supercharges
Monica Guica, Andrew Strominger
http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.3295

The authors state "Ultimately the most interesting and most physically relevant case is no supersymmetry at all. But at the moment analytic control in this case is quite limited."

Does this mean that string theory could work without supersymmetry? How about AdS/CFT?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
String theory needs susy at the Planck scale. Low scale SUSY is just a nice way to keep scalars light.

Put another way, non-observation of SUSY at LHC could not rule out string theory.
 
BenTheMan said:
String theory needs susy at the Planck scale. Low scale SUSY is just a nice way to keep scalars light.

Put another way, non-observation of SUSY at LHC could not rule out string theory.

Is there an energy above which if we don't find supersymmetry, then string theory will be falsified? ie. Is string theory falsifiable at least in principle?
 
The Planck scale.
 
So if I did lots of experiments at 10^29 eV and didn't find supersymmetry, string theory would be false?
 
Yes. If you were able to do experiments at that energy, string theory (as far as I know) would definitely be falsifiable.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top