Stringtheory's Braincell Calculation and Information Entropy: An Exploration

  • Thread starter Thread starter Spin_Network
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vacuum
Spin_Network
Messages
373
Reaction score
0
What is the Maximum number of braincells needed to calculate the Minimum,or precise initial Vacuum of Stringtheory? :cool:

Q)Why does stringtheory need a Maximum number of Braincells to calculate a minimum equation?

Q)Is there a correspondence between the Maximum and Minimum number of braincells and Information Entropy?

great thread by Lubos:http://motls.blogspot.com/2004/11/violation-of-complementarity.html
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm thinking about starting a new physics forum entitled 'Not Even Funny'. Suggestion: try asking serious questions without being insulting. Hint: I found that 'clever' remark insulting.
 
Chronos said:
I'm thinking about starting a new physics forum entitled 'Not Even Funny'. Suggestion: try asking serious questions without being insulting. Hint: I found that 'clever' remark insulting.

Time you read thread in the link above?..hint, Shahriar S Afshar's reply to Lubos..and following postings.

If you 'think' that there is a clever remark in my post that is "insulting"..then you are using way-to-many braincells for all the 'obvious' wrong! reasons.

Thanks for being a 'guinea-pig', though I doubt anyone else would be offended, but saying that if they had 'NOT' read the link-posting first, then I guess my wording could be "not-even-classified"?

Look for words in the Lubos thread such as :Kaehler action

P.S something quite apt by Afshar caught my eye:Finally, I would appreciate if you find the facts about exactly what I have said, before going out there and making inaccurate quotations on my behalf.
 
Whatever. Perhaps it would have been more effective to post the link BEFORE making inane remarks. Apologies for the inaccurate quotations. I didn't realize I quoted you. Perhaps you have your own special definition of what constitutes a 'quotation'.
 
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
Many of us have heard of "twistors", arguably Roger Penrose's biggest contribution to theoretical physics. Twistor space is a space which maps nonlocally onto physical space-time; in particular, lightlike structures in space-time, like null lines and light cones, become much more "local" in twistor space. For various reasons, Penrose thought that twistor space was possibly a more fundamental arena for theoretical physics than space-time, and for many years he and a hardy band of mostly...
Back
Top