Structural analysis influence lines in beams

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the Müller Breslau Principle for determining influence lines in beams, specifically for vertical reactions at supports. Participants emphasize the importance of using Free Body Diagrams (FBD) and static equilibrium equations to analyze forces and moments in the system. The conversation highlights the challenge of calculating reactions at point C after establishing vertical reactions at points A and E. A clear understanding of the kinematic procedure versus the static procedure is also noted as crucial for solving these types of problems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium equations in structural analysis
  • Familiarity with Free Body Diagrams (FBD)
  • Knowledge of the Müller Breslau Principle
  • Basic concepts of influence lines in beam theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the Müller Breslau Principle in structural analysis
  • Learn how to construct Free Body Diagrams (FBD) for complex structures
  • Research the kinematic procedure for finding influence lines
  • Explore static equilibrium equations in the context of beam reactions
USEFUL FOR

Civil engineers, structural analysts, and students studying mechanics of materials who are focused on understanding influence lines and static equilibrium in beams.

Romulus3
Messages
4
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


http://antishift.org/image.php?id=16122&size=medium

Homework Equations


Static Equilibrium equations: since most of the supports are rollers, only y-forces are considered as well as moment equations. I'm pretty sure E and F are hinges so there are no moments around E and F.

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm having trouble with solving the FBD equations. First I drew an FBD of segment AE and placed a unit load on the beam at a distance x away from A. Then I solved for the vertical reactions at A and E. But once i do this, I don't know how the reaction a C is affected. can anyone please help me with this? If I know how to do part (a), I am confident I can do the rest. thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you familiar with the kinematic procedure to find influence lines? I always found it pretty much easier than the standard (i.e. static) procedure.

Basically, if you want to find the influence line for some statistical quantity, then you have to remove its "realization" (i.e. the bond which allows this quantity (force, torque...) to act) and turn your determinate system into a mechanism with one degree of freedom. You add a generalized unit force at the place where you released the bond (internal or external) and create the displacement sketch of the system, which presents the influence line for the mentioned statistical quantity.
 
Hey radou,

is this the Müller Breslau Principle? I remember skimming over that in my textbook, and your description seems similar. However, the problem states I should solve using statics. :frown:
 
Romulus3 said:
Hey radou,

is this the Müller Breslau Principle? I remember skimming over that in my textbook, and your description seems similar. However, the problem states I should solve using statics. :frown:

Well, you can start with a sketch of the influence line of the vertical reaction at C with the Müller Breslau Principle (since it's almost trivial to find it), perhaps it will help you to reason about "influences" in the static procedure. I'm a bit foggy with that procedure, so I can't be of any great help right now. Should revise it, though. :rolleyes:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K