What is the Influence Line for a Beam Supported at a Roller?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the influence line for a beam supported at a roller, specifically addressing the behavior of the beam under different loading conditions and support types. Participants explore the implications of roller and hinge supports on beam deflection and shear forces, with a focus on specific examples from a homework problem.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the deflection of the beam at the roller in example b, suggesting that it should not deflect due to the roller's support characteristics.
  • Others clarify that the support in figure b is an internal hinge, which allows rotation, while the roller does not, leading to confusion about the beam's behavior.
  • One participant argues that the roller acts as a pivot point for the beam segment, influencing whether the beam can deflect upwards based on applied shear forces.
  • Another participant suggests using a virtual load to analyze shear forces at different points on the beam, indicating that the shear force at the roller can vary depending on the load's position.
  • There is a discussion about the shear force being zero at the roller when a unit load is placed directly on it, leading to further inquiries about the shear force to the left and right of the roller.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the deflection behavior of the beam at the roller and the role of the internal hinge. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing interpretations of the beam's response to loading conditions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about support behavior, the dependence on specific loading scenarios, and the need for further clarification on shear force calculations at various points along the beam.

fonseh
Messages
521
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


In part a , the author state that at the roller , it will restrain the beam from moving vertically , so the beam wouldn't deflect at roller at part a ... But at b , the author showed that the beam will deflect at roller , why is it so ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



IMO , the beam can't deflect at the roller in example b . so there's no influence line at the region between the roller and the pin [/B]
 

Attachments

  • 537.jpg
    537.jpg
    36.8 KB · Views: 578
Physics news on Phys.org
In figure b) , that is an internal hinge, not a roller support. Internal hinges allow the beam to rotate about them.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonseh
sakonpure6 said:
In figure b) , that is an internal hinge, not a roller support. Internal hinges allow the beam to rotate about them.
yes , there's internal hinge , it will allow rotation , but on the other end , it's an roller , roller wouldn't allow rotation , right ? So , the beam which connected to the right part of the hinge can't deflect as shown by the author , right ??

Although there's an internal hinge that will allow rotation , but the roller would not allow roattion , so th beam can't deflect as shown , right ?
 

Attachments

  • 537.jpg
    537.jpg
    36.4 KB · Views: 762
The roller here acts as a pivot point for the beam segment from the internal hinge to the rollers at C.

For positive convention as drawn for the guided roller motion at C, the beam segment from the internal hinge up to the guided roller will move as a whole, pivoting about the roller support.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonseh
sakonpure6 said:
The roller here acts as a pivot point for the beam segment from the internal hinge to the rollers at C.

For positive convention as drawn for the guided roller motion at C, the beam segment from the internal hinge up to the guided roller will move as a whole, pivoting about the roller support.
The problem is the shear force is applied at B ( which is closer to the roller at C rather the hinge) , so the roller at C will determine whether the beam will deflect upwards or not ... So, since the roller resist the upwards motion of the beam , so the beam wouldn't deflect updwards , am i right ?
 
fonseh said:
So, since the roller resist the upwards motion of the beam

I don't really understand what you mean. If your in doubt, just take a virtual load , apply it on the beam, and manually find the shear force at B.

If you put the unit load at the roller, you will find that shear at B is 0 . If you put the load to the left of the roller, Assuming positive force direction is downwards, you will find that the shear force is some positive value and to the right of the beam some negative value.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonseh
do
sakonpure6 said:
you will find that the shear force is some positive value and to the right of the beam some negative value.
Do you mean at the roller the shear force isn't 0 , but negative value of the force applied ?
 
Sorry, I meant to the right and left of the roller.

Placing the unit load directly on the roller means that the reaction support at the roller is 1. So , there won't be any shear force any where else on the beam.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonseh
sakonpure6 said:
Sorry, I meant to the right and left of the roller.

Placing the unit load directly on the roller means that the reaction support at the roller is 1. So , there won't be any shear force any where else on the beam.
What do you mean ? Can you explain it further ? What is the shear force exactly at the support(roller) , to the left and to the right of the beam ?
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K