Struggling with a Limit: Help Appreciated!

  • Thread starter Thread starter student111
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
student111
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I can't get the following limit to work:

lim(X->0) 1/(ix)*(exp(imx) - 1 ) = m

I'm sorry for the poor notation. I tried expanding the exponential, and L'hopitals rule and combinations of these approaches, but i can't get it to work out. Any help is much appreciated!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
student111 said:
I can't get the following limit to work:

lim(X->0) 1/(ix)*(exp(imx) - 1 ) = m

I'm sorry for the poor notation. I tried expanding the exponential, and L'hopitals rule and combinations of these approaches, but i can't get it to work out. Any help is much appreciated!

I assume you mean \lim_{x\fo 0}\frac{e^{imx}- 1}{ix}. I can see no reason why L'Hopital's rule would not work:

Both e^{imx}-1 and ix go to 0 as x goes to 0.

\left(e^{imx}\right)'= I am e^{imx} while (ix)'= i. By L'Hopitals rule, the limit is the same as \lim_{x\to 0}\frac{im e^{imx}}{i}= m\left(\lim_{x\to 0}e^{imx}\right)= m.
 
doh! I differentiated the whole part instead of nominator and denominator separately..

Thx alot
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top