Studying Struggling with Physics: Helping a Second Year Major Succeed

  • Thread starter Thread starter cosmicjelly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Studying
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a second-year physics major struggling with understanding classical mechanics despite a structured study routine. The individual attends lectures, reviews notes, reads textbooks, practices problems, and attempts to teach the material to a roommate, dedicating significant time to studying. Despite these efforts, they express frustration over their slow comprehension and a GPA of 2.65, which raises concerns about future academic and career prospects in astrophysics research. The participant has completed various math courses successfully but struggles to apply mathematical concepts in physics, leading to questions about their overall academic performance. Other contributors in the discussion highlight the need to assess performance across all subjects, suggesting that issues may extend beyond physics alone.
cosmicjelly
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am currently a second year majoring in physics. I am currently taking classical mechanics. I took introductory physics in my first year. In my first year, I did decently well, but I felt like I wasn't understanding the material.
My study method for my second year is to go to lecture, pay attention to the professor, go back home re-read the lecture notes, understand the derivations and read the book, and practice problems. After I have done all of that, I would try to explain it to my roommate as if I am teaching the material. Usually, this process takes about 6 hours on weekends, weekdays about 1 to 2 hours. However, this process can only take me so far. It works sometimes, but other times it doesn't. I am a bit frustrated at myself because, I can't understand the material as fast as others, it takes me a few days to understand it. I can do the math, which is kinda the easy part for me, but applying it to physics problems is the challenge. Previous math courses I have taken are: Calculus, differential equations, multivariable calc, linear algebra(currently taking).
I am currently standing on a 2.65 gpa, with this I will be going nowhere, heck not even graduate school. I have tried doing Feynman note-taking technique, it kinda works but it takes way too much time. What I want to do with my physics degree is help with research in astrophysics. I know its vague, but at this point, I don't even know if I will qualify for any job.

At this point I don't know what to do. I want to stay in physics because I love how difficult it is and how it can be applied to real life situations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Miriam Gonzalez said:
I am currently a second year majoring in physics. I am currently taking classical mechanics. I took introductory physics in my first year. In my first year, I did decently well, but I felt like I wasn't understanding the material.
My study method for my second year is to go to lecture, pay attention to the professor, go back home re-read the lecture notes, understand the derivations and read the book, and practice problems. After I have done all of that, I would try to explain it to my roommate as if I am teaching the material. Usually, this process takes about 6 hours on weekends, weekdays about 1 to 2 hours. However, this process can only take me so far. It works sometimes, but other times it doesn't. I am a bit frustrated at myself because, I can't understand the material as fast as others, it takes me a few days to understand it. I can do the math, which is kinda the easy part for me, but applying it to physics problems is the challenge. Previous math courses I have taken are: Calculus, differential equations, multivariable calc, linear algebra(currently taking).
I am currently standing on a 2.65 gpa, with this I will be going nowhere, heck not even graduate school. I have tried doing Feynman note-taking technique, it kinda works but it takes way too much time. What I want to do with my physics degree is help with research in astrophysics. I know its vague, but at this point, I don't even know if I will qualify for any job.

At this point I don't know what to do. I want to stay in physics because I love how difficult it is and how it can be applied to real life situations.

There are a few things that I don't quite understand here.

First of all, you stated that you are in your 2nd year and have GPA of 2.65. Unless you have a different set of curriculum than most students, you have taken mostly math classes, and intro general physics courses, along with electives. Is this correct?

If it is, then IF you state that you have taken all those math courses and presumably, you "can do the math" (meaning you got good grades in your math courses), how did you end up with such a poor GPA? Were you getting F's in your general physics classes that somehow pulled down your average THAT much?

Besides, if you are in your 2nd year, would have only done your general physics courses and have not delve too deeply into the more advanced topics too much. So did you crash that badly in all of your general physics classes?

In other words, I'm trying to understand how you can end up with such a GPA this early in your undergraduate program IF your ONLY problem is with your physics classes.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
There are a few things that I don't quite understand here.

First of all, you stated that you are in your 2nd year and have GPA of 2.65. Unless you have a different set of curriculum than most students, you have taken mostly math classes, and intro general physics courses, along with electives. Is this correct?

If it is, then IF you state that you have taken all those math courses and presumably, you "can do the math" (meaning you got good grades in your math courses), how did you end up with such a poor GPA? Were you getting F's in your general physics classes that somehow pulled down your average THAT much?

Besides, if you are in your 2nd year, would have only done your general physics courses and have not delve too deeply into the more advanced topics too much. So did you crash that badly in all of your general physics classes?

In other words, I'm trying to understand how you can end up with such a GPA this early in your undergraduate program IF your ONLY problem is with your physics classes.

Zz.

For my first year up to second year,
pre-calc(B) and history(B+) (Took during summer)
English(C) First-year calc(B-) Intro-PHYS(B+)
English(B+) Calc(B-) Intro-PHYS(B-)
Calc(D) Diff-EQ(C) Intro-PHYS(C) (This is when things go downhill, I will be retaking the calc class later)
Art(B+) Comp-SCI(B) Multi-Calc(B) (Took during summer)

Second year
Chem/LAB(B-, C+) Multi-Calc(B-) Classical(C+)
 
cosmicjelly said:
For my first year up to second year,
pre-calc(B) and history(B+) (Took during summer)
English(C) First-year calc(B-) Intro-PHYS(B+)
English(B+) Calc(B-) Intro-PHYS(B-)
Calc(D) Diff-EQ(C) Intro-PHYS(C) (This is when things go downhill, I will be retaking the calc class later)
Art(B+) Comp-SCI(B) Multi-Calc(B) (Took during summer)

Second year
Chem/LAB(B-, C+) Multi-Calc(B-) Classical(C+)

Based on what you have given me here, I will say that it isn't just physics that you have a problem with.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
Based on what you have given me here, I will say that it isn't just physics that you have a problem with.

Zz.
Math, Chem and English, as well?
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
623
Replies
22
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Back
Top