Stuck on Algebra in Time Dilation Problem.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a time dilation problem involving a round trip to a planet 20 light-years away, with a maximum travel time of 40 years for astronauts. The original equation set up for time dilation is T = L/v = T[o]/√(1-v^2/c^2), where v is the rocket's velocity and c is the speed of light. The user struggles to isolate v and has attempted squaring both sides, leading to an incorrect equation. A suggested solution for v is provided, which simplifies to v = cd/√(d^2 + c^2t^2), incorporating the speed of light, distance, and time. The discussion highlights the complexities of manipulating equations in relativistic physics.
erincaldwell
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm working on a simple time dilation problem: Astronomers discover a planet orbiting around a star similar to our sun that is 20 LY away. How fast must a rocket ship go if the round trip is to take no longer than 40 years in time for the astronauts aboard?

I have set up the problem:

T= L/v=T[o]/√(1-v^2/c^2)
where v is velocity and c is the speed of light and T[o] is proper time.
So:

= [2*(20LY)*(9.5*10^15 m/LY)]/v = 40 years/√(1-v^2/c^2).

Now I need to solve for v. I don't know how to get v alone. I tried squaring both sides and ended up with an equation like T[o]^2/L^2 + c^2 = v^2 , but that doesn't get me the right answer.
Please help! I'm going crazy!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is the basic equation that you have written out.

\frac{d}{v} = \frac{t}{\sqrt{1- \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}

Solving for v gives:

v = \frac{cd}{\sqrt{d^2+c^2t^2}}

where
c = speed of light constant
d = distance in metres
t = time (on spaceship) in seconds
v = velocity in m/s

At least by my reckoning!
 
Last edited:
If you want me to run through the procedure that I used to get the new equation in v then I'd be happy to run through it for you.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top