Studying Quantum Field Theory without taking graduate QM?

AI Thread Summary
Studying quantum field theory (QFT) requires a solid foundation in advanced quantum mechanics and classical mechanics, which includes familiarity with Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalisms. While prior knowledge from undergraduate quantum mechanics and special relativity is beneficial, it may not be sufficient for a rigorous self-study of QFT. Using Sakurai's textbook alongside QFT resources can help, but a graduate-level understanding of quantum mechanics is highly recommended for deeper comprehension. Mastering QFT demands significant dedication, as it is a complex subject. For those seeking only a basic understanding before formal coursework, the current background may suffice.
xdrgnh
Messages
415
Reaction score
0
Hello over the summer I would like to study quantum field theory. I took two semesters of undergraduate quantum mechanics using Griffith's textbook. We covered the entire book in those two semesters. I also know my special relativity pretty well. Is that enough to self study quantum field theory rigorously. I also took a class in graduate classical mechanics and know Lagrangian, Hamiltonian formalism pretty well. Furthermore I have lots of experience with canonical perturbation theory.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would look at Sakurai concurrently. If/once you are comfortable with the material in Sakurai, then you should be ready to learn and appreciate QFT. For QFT I would highly recommend the book Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model.
 
xdrgnh said:
Is that enough to self study quantum field theory rigorously.

Rigorously? Probably not. You'd be skipping something like two or three classes and building on a foundation that is not particuilarly known for its rigor.
 
If Sakurai might as well be written in Vietnamese for you, as it probably would be if you haven't done a graduate level QM class, I wouldn't recommend it.

Otherwise, have at it, but it will take *dedication* to master QFT. This is not an easy subject. However, that might not be what you are after. If you just want to learn some of the basics and plan on taking a course later in the subject, you should be fine.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Back
Top