Stupid question, dealing with algebra and fractions.

Ryumast3r
Like the title says... I should be way past this (in ODEs+Lin. Algebra). I'm just really tired, have a final tomorrow, and cannot for the life of me understand why this works out the way it does.

Here goes (and please show most steps, it'd be greatly appreciated, thanks):

Start out with:

dP/dt = - (P-5)*(P-2)

Separate dP/dT since the whole point of this is to later integrate and solve an IVP, I get all that, just don't get the transition between this :

dP/((P-5)*(P-2)) = -dt and this next part here:

(dP/3)*(1/(P-5) - 1/(P-2)) = -dt

I know it's some fractions thing all from algebra that I should know, like I said, just cannot for the life of me figure it out, I get the whole "pull dP out" thing, it's where the 3 came from that I'm having trouble with. Tried to backsolve but I think there's just some identity I'm forgetting.

Anyway, any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Ryumast3r said:
Like the title says... I should be way past this (in ODEs+Lin. Algebra). I'm just really tired, have a final tomorrow, and cannot for the life of me understand why this works out the way it does.

Here goes (and please show most steps, it'd be greatly appreciated, thanks):

Start out with:

dP/dt = - (P-5)*(P-2)

Separate dP/dT since the whole point of this is to later integrate and solve an IVP, I get all that, just don't get the transition between this :

dP/((P-5)*(P-2)) = -dt and this next part here:

(dP/3)*(1/(P-5) - 1/(P-2)) = -dt

I know it's some fractions thing all from algebra that I should know, like I said, just cannot for the life of me figure it out, I get the whole "pull dP out" thing, it's where the 3 came from that I'm having trouble with. Tried to backsolve but I think there's just some identity I'm forgetting.

Anyway, any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. :)

Hey there Ryumast3r and welcome to the forums.

Essentially what you are trying to do is turn 1/[(P-2) x (P-5)] into A/(P-2) + B/(P-5). You set both equal and do some algebra and you'll find that the P's cancel and you'll get numbers for A and B.
 
Right, thank you. :)

Sorry for the dumb question, I'm just so burnt out. :P

(also kinda embarrassed I had to ask that since I've gone through calc. :P)
 
Ryumast3r said:
Right, thank you. :)

Sorry for the dumb question, I'm just so burnt out. :P

(also kinda embarrassed I had to ask that since I've gone through calc. :P)

Dude don't stress, we all make simple mistakes. Its better to clarify things than to not clarify things and get more things wrong.
 
Yeah, thanks again.
 
^Lol, the reason it's "dumb" is because it's a fundamental part of the class I'm in and I totally forgot it. :P
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top