STUPID Vector qusetion - dont understand dot product rule

thomas49th
Messages
645
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The points A and B have position vectors a = (2,2,1) and b (1,1,-4) respectively relative to an origin O. (im using column notation for shorthand)

Prove that OA is perpendicular to AB

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



To be perpendicular the angle between the lines is 90

using the dot product rule:

vectors a and b should multiply to give cos 90 (which is 0)

AB = (3,3,-3)-(2,2,1) = (1,1,-4)
so:
(2,2,1).(1,1,-4) = (2,2,-4)

NOW WHAT I DONT UNDERSTAND IS why you add the components i,j,k to get 0. I can see 2 + 2 -4 =0, but why do you do this? Why can you do this

Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Simple answer: A dot B is a number (scalar) - not a vector. It's definition is: axbx + ayby + azbz.
 
thomas49th said:

Homework Statement



The points A and B have position vectors a = (2,2,1) and b (1,1,-4) respectively relative to an origin O. (im using column notation for shorthand)
You're using row notation. Columns are vertical.
thomas49th said:
Prove that OA is perpendicular to AB
Are you sure you have written the problem correctly? Vectors OA and OB are perpendicular, but OA and AB aren't.
thomas49th said:

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



To be perpendicular the angle between the lines is 90

using the dot product rule:

vectors a and b should multiply to give cos 90 (which is 0)

AB = (3,3,-3)-(2,2,1) = (1,1,-4)
Where did you get (3, 3, 3)? Vector AB = OB - OA, which is (1, 1, -4) - (2, 2, 1) = (-1, -1, -5).
thomas49th said:
so:
(2,2,1).(1,1,-4) = (2,2,-4)

NOW WHAT I DONT UNDERSTAND IS why you add the components i,j,k to get 0. I can see 2 + 2 -4 =0, but why do you do this? Why can you do this

Thanks :)
 
Mark44 said:
You're using row notation. Columns are vertical.
It's just ordered-set notation; neither row nor column vectors have commas!
 
Hi,
You did show that OA is perpendicular to OB. That's good.

I think your question is "Why does the dot-product rule work? Why do you multiply similar components, and then add up the sum?"

Here is one answer that might help you make sense of it:
Look at the dot-product of A.A: it is simply the Pythagorean Theorem.
If A = (ax, ay, az)
Then A.A = ax2 + ay2 + az2.
So ... the dot-product is a method of determining the length of a vector: Lth (A) = \sqrt{A.A}

That's just an example to make you feel comfortable with the rule - because it's useful and makes sense in that situation.

Good luck.

BobM
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top