Style Guides for Physics & Computer Science Texts

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the importance of adhering to style guides in academic writing, particularly in physics and computer science. While many journals have their own specific style guides, there is a suggestion to consider The Chicago Manual of Style for clarity and simplicity in writing. The conversation notes that some papers become unreadable due to authors emulating outdated styles from classic literature, which can detract from the clarity of their work. Additionally, it is mentioned that modern journals often operate with limited editorial resources, leading to less scrutiny over minor stylistic issues like split infinitives. Overall, the emphasis is on the need for clear communication in academic papers and the value of peer review from colleagues familiar with the field.
R A V E N
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
If not official, then unofficial, but widely accepted? If yes, are there some separate style guides for physics and computer science texts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Generally each journal will have it's own style guide.
Both editorially, if they want third or first person, how they want units references given etc. and typesetting - they often supply a latex stylesheet to do this part automatically
 


Thanks.

Maybe I should look into The Chicago Manual of Style?
 


I would just concentrate on trying to clearly and simply explain what you are trying to show. And have other people who are familiar with the field but not directly with your work review it.

There are some seriously unreadable papers because people are trying to emulate the style of classic papers, or trying to write papers as they did 100years ago. There are also a couple of journals that seem to delight in doing this.

Most journals today are on such tight margins that there is no real editorial effort to spare so they aren't going to question your split infinitives.
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...
Back
Top