Style Guides for Physics & Computer Science Texts

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the existence and importance of style guides for physics and computer science texts, emphasizing that while many journals have their own specific guidelines, there is no universally accepted style guide. The Chicago Manual of Style is suggested as a potential resource for clarity in writing. The conversation also highlights the issue of readability in academic papers, noting that some authors attempt to mimic outdated styles, leading to confusion. Finally, it points out the limited editorial resources available in many journals today, which affects the quality of editorial oversight.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with academic writing standards
  • Understanding of LaTeX typesetting
  • Knowledge of The Chicago Manual of Style
  • Awareness of journal-specific style guidelines
NEXT STEPS
  • Research LaTeX stylesheet implementation for academic papers
  • Explore The Chicago Manual of Style for writing clarity
  • Investigate common editorial practices in academic journals
  • Study readability techniques for technical writing
USEFUL FOR

Academic writers, researchers in physics and computer science, and anyone involved in the publication process who seeks to improve the clarity and effectiveness of their technical writing.

R A V E N
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
If not official, then unofficial, but widely accepted? If yes, are there some separate style guides for physics and computer science texts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Generally each journal will have it's own style guide.
Both editorially, if they want third or first person, how they want units references given etc. and typesetting - they often supply a latex stylesheet to do this part automatically
 


Thanks.

Maybe I should look into The Chicago Manual of Style?
 


I would just concentrate on trying to clearly and simply explain what you are trying to show. And have other people who are familiar with the field but not directly with your work review it.

There are some seriously unreadable papers because people are trying to emulate the style of classic papers, or trying to write papers as they did 100years ago. There are also a couple of journals that seem to delight in doing this.

Most journals today are on such tight margins that there is no real editorial effort to spare so they aren't going to question your split infinitives.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K