SU(2) Rotation & Spinors: Connected?

  • Thread starter Thread starter HowardTheDuck
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spinors Su(2)
HowardTheDuck
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Hi, a fairly quick question. I'm reading Bruce Schumm's book "Deep Down Things" and he says that in SU(2) you have to rotate by 720 degrees to return to your starting point. This is clearly the same definition as a spinor. My question is, then, does rotation in SU(2) automatically imply the rotation of a spinor? Or is a spinor a special case of a rotation in SU(2)? Any help much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A spinor is an object on which an element of SU(2) acts, just a physical 3-d vector is an object on which a normal rotation (element of SO(3)) acts.
 
Thanks. So that appears to suggest that, yes, if you are rotating in SU(2) then your objects behave as spinors. Yes, that's surely correct.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top