Sudden ceasing of energy generation

  • Thread starter Thread starter blumfeld0
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Generation
AI Thread Summary
If the sun suddenly ceased energy generation, it would take about 8.5 minutes for the effects to be noticed on Earth due to light speed limitations. The sun would not become a black hole; instead, it would eventually collapse into a white dwarf after burning out in approximately 5 billion years. If fusion stopped, the sun might resemble a brown dwarf, a dim, cool star that fails to ignite hydrogen. Significant changes would occur over a Kelvin-Helmholtz timescale of about 30 million years, as the sun would gradually cool and lose thermal energy. Ultimately, the sun's mass is insufficient to form a black hole, as it does not exceed the Chandrasekhar limit.
blumfeld0
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
I always wondered what would happen if the sun suddenly stopped doing energy generation.
i know that it would us 8.5 minutes to find as limited by the speed of light.

or perhaps 10 million years to find out as that is how long it would take a photon to travel from the core to the surface according to random walk calculations. is this a possibility?

would the sun become a black hole as gravity took over and won and pressure (caused by energy generation) stopped?
what would happen?


thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
would the sun become a black hole as gravity took over and won and pressure (caused by energy generation) stopped?

It would not become a black hole - it is too small. After the sun burns out (in about 5 billion years) it will eventually collapse into a white dwarf.
 
It would glow as a hot ember (it still has all that stored thermal energy after all) and slowly collapse as the thermal and radiative pressure gradients could not hold up against gravity.
 
I always wondered what would happen if the sun suddenly stopped doing energy generation.

If all fusion stopped suddenly, I suspect the sun would eventually become a degenerate object very similar to a brown dwarf, which is a star that wasn't massive enough to ignite hydrogen in its core. They're very cool and very dim, so we've only just recently been able to observe them.

In order for a white dwarf to be formed, the envelope would have to be stripped. In the absence of shell hydrogen burning around the core, I don't think this could occur.
i know that it would us 8.5 minutes to find as limited by the speed of light.

If our neutrino detectors were on, we could potentially find out in 8.5 minutes because they would stop being formed in the fusion reactions. Otherwise, however, the change probably wouldn't be noticable in a human lifetime.
or perhaps 10 million years to find out as that is how long it would take a photon to travel from the core to the surface according to random walk calculations. is this a possibility?

Significant changes would occur on the Kelvin-Helmholtz timescale, which is the approximate time it takes the sun to radiate its gravitational potential energy. This is around 30 million years for the sun.
would the sun become a black hole as gravity took over and won and pressure (caused by energy generation) stopped?

Pressure is not caused by energy generation, it is just maintained by it. As franz said, the star would gradually cool and drop in temperature, leading to a gradual drop in thermal energy. In order to compensate, the star would have to collapse. The end result would not be a black hole because the sun is not above the Chandrasekhar mass, as mathman implied.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top