Sum of a rational number and an irrational number ....

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The sum of a rational number and an irrational number is always irrational. This conclusion is rigorously proven by assuming that the sum of a rational number \( a \in \mathbb{Q} \) and an irrational number \( b \in \mathbb{R} \) results in a rational number \( r \). By manipulating the equation \( a + b = r \), it leads to a contradiction, demonstrating that \( b \) cannot be rational. The discussion references Ethan D. Bloch's "The Real Numbers and Real Analysis" and Derek Goldrei's "Classic Set Theory," both of which utilize Dedekind Cuts and Cauchy Sequences in their approaches to real number construction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rational and irrational numbers
  • Familiarity with Dedekind Cuts and Cauchy Sequences
  • Basic knowledge of set theory
  • Proficiency in algebraic manipulation of equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Dedekind Cuts in detail
  • Explore Cauchy Sequences and their role in real analysis
  • Review proofs involving the closure properties of rational numbers
  • Investigate the implications of irrational numbers in mathematical proofs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of real analysis, educators teaching number theory, and anyone interested in the foundational aspects of rational and irrational numbers.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am trying without success to provide a rigorous proof for the following exercise:

Show that the sum of a rational number and an irrational number is irrational.Can someone please help me with a rigorous solution ...I am working from the following books:

Ethan D. Bloch: The Real Numbers and Real Analysis

and

Derek Goldrei: Classic Set TheoryBoth use a Dedekind Cut approach to the construction of the real numbers (but Goldrei also uses Cauchy Sequences ... )
I am taking the definition of an irrational number as equivalent to an irrational cut as defined by Bloch as follows:https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/7014To assist those members reading this post I am providing Bloch's definition of a Dedekind Cut plus a Lemma indicating the that there are at least as many of them as there are rational numbers ...https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/7015Help will be much appreciated ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
I am trying without success to provide a rigorous proof for the following exercise:

Show that the sum of a rational number and an irrational number is irrational.Can someone please help me with a rigorous solution ...I am working from the following books:

Ethan D. Bloch: The Real Numbers and Real Analysis

and

Derek Goldrei: Classic Set TheoryBoth use a Dedekind Cut approach to the construction of the real numbers (but Goldrei also uses Cauchy Sequences ... )
I am taking the definition of an irrational number as equivalent to an irrational cut as defined by Bloch as follows:To assist those members reading this post I am providing Bloch's definition of a Dedekind Cut plus a Lemma indicating the that there are at least as many of them as there are rational numbers ...Help will be much appreciated ...

Peter

After reflecting on this problem ... I now think that the answer to the exercise above may be disappointingly trivial ...

Consider the following:

Let $$a \in \mathbb{Q}$$ and let $$b \in \mathbb{R}$$ \ $$\mathbb{Q}$$

Then suppose a + b = r

Now ... assume r is rational

Then b = r - a ...

But since r and a are rational ... we have r - a is rational ..

Then ... we have that an irrational number b is equal to a rational number ...

Contradiction!

So ... r is irrational ..
Is that correct?

Peter
 
Last edited:
No need for "Dedekind cuts". All that is needed is that the rational numbers are closed under subtraction: if x= \frac{a}{b} and y= \frac{c}{d} are rational numbers, then x- y= \frac{a}{b}- \frac{c}{d}= \frac{ad- bc}{bd} is rational number.

Now, in contradiction, suppose a is rational and b is irrational and that there sum, c, is rational. From a+ b= c, we have a= c- b, contradicting the fact that the difference of two rational numbers is rational.
 
HallsofIvy said:
No need for "Dedekind cuts". All that is needed is that the rational numbers are closed under subtraction: if x= \frac{a}{b} and y= \frac{c}{d} are rational numbers, then x- y= \frac{a}{b}- \frac{c}{d}= \frac{ad- bc}{bd} is rational number.

Now, in contradiction, suppose a is rational and b is irrational and that there sum, c, is rational. From a+ b= c, we have a= c- b, contradicting the fact that the difference of two rational numbers is rational.
Thanks HallsofIvy ... appreciate the help ...

Peter
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K