Sum of a rational number and an irrational number ....

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the exercise of proving that the sum of a rational number and an irrational number is irrational. Participants explore various approaches to provide a rigorous proof, referencing different mathematical concepts and definitions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Peter initiates the discussion by seeking help for a rigorous proof, referencing the Dedekind Cut approach from specific texts.
  • Peter later reflects on the problem and proposes a reasoning that if the sum of a rational number and an irrational number is assumed to be rational, it leads to a contradiction, suggesting that the sum must be irrational.
  • Another participant argues that the proof does not require Dedekind cuts, emphasizing that the closure of rational numbers under subtraction suffices to show the contradiction if the sum were rational.
  • This participant reiterates that if a rational number and an irrational number sum to a rational number, it contradicts the closure property of rational numbers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of using Dedekind cuts in the proof. While Peter initially supports this method, others argue that simpler reasoning based on the properties of rational numbers is sufficient. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the preferred approach to the proof.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific mathematical definitions and properties, such as Dedekind Cuts and the closure of rational numbers under subtraction, but do not reach a consensus on the best method for the proof.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am trying without success to provide a rigorous proof for the following exercise:

Show that the sum of a rational number and an irrational number is irrational.Can someone please help me with a rigorous solution ...I am working from the following books:

Ethan D. Bloch: The Real Numbers and Real Analysis

and

Derek Goldrei: Classic Set TheoryBoth use a Dedekind Cut approach to the construction of the real numbers (but Goldrei also uses Cauchy Sequences ... )
I am taking the definition of an irrational number as equivalent to an irrational cut as defined by Bloch as follows:https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/7014To assist those members reading this post I am providing Bloch's definition of a Dedekind Cut plus a Lemma indicating the that there are at least as many of them as there are rational numbers ...https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/7015Help will be much appreciated ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
I am trying without success to provide a rigorous proof for the following exercise:

Show that the sum of a rational number and an irrational number is irrational.Can someone please help me with a rigorous solution ...I am working from the following books:

Ethan D. Bloch: The Real Numbers and Real Analysis

and

Derek Goldrei: Classic Set TheoryBoth use a Dedekind Cut approach to the construction of the real numbers (but Goldrei also uses Cauchy Sequences ... )
I am taking the definition of an irrational number as equivalent to an irrational cut as defined by Bloch as follows:To assist those members reading this post I am providing Bloch's definition of a Dedekind Cut plus a Lemma indicating the that there are at least as many of them as there are rational numbers ...Help will be much appreciated ...

Peter

After reflecting on this problem ... I now think that the answer to the exercise above may be disappointingly trivial ...

Consider the following:

Let $$a \in \mathbb{Q}$$ and let $$b \in \mathbb{R}$$ \ $$\mathbb{Q}$$

Then suppose a + b = r

Now ... assume r is rational

Then b = r - a ...

But since r and a are rational ... we have r - a is rational ..

Then ... we have that an irrational number b is equal to a rational number ...

Contradiction!

So ... r is irrational ..
Is that correct?

Peter
 
Last edited:
No need for "Dedekind cuts". All that is needed is that the rational numbers are closed under subtraction: if x= \frac{a}{b} and y= \frac{c}{d} are rational numbers, then x- y= \frac{a}{b}- \frac{c}{d}= \frac{ad- bc}{bd} is rational number.

Now, in contradiction, suppose a is rational and b is irrational and that there sum, c, is rational. From a+ b= c, we have a= c- b, contradicting the fact that the difference of two rational numbers is rational.
 
HallsofIvy said:
No need for "Dedekind cuts". All that is needed is that the rational numbers are closed under subtraction: if x= \frac{a}{b} and y= \frac{c}{d} are rational numbers, then x- y= \frac{a}{b}- \frac{c}{d}= \frac{ad- bc}{bd} is rational number.

Now, in contradiction, suppose a is rational and b is irrational and that there sum, c, is rational. From a+ b= c, we have a= c- b, contradicting the fact that the difference of two rational numbers is rational.
Thanks HallsofIvy ... appreciate the help ...

Peter
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K